On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Brian Martinez<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Al, and everyone else,
>
> At the very moment you sent this to NAG another coworker called me up
> reporting the same problem. It turns out that our virus scanner had a
> definition added to it that was rejecting on the word/prefix/domain/etc.
> 'com' - Needless to say I was enraged!! Someone already reported the problem
> to the definition maintainer and I added the rule to the ignore list.
> Another test shows that the messages are now going through that were being
> rejected by that rule.
>
> Messages that were rejected will need to be resent.
You could monitor the virus-reject rate and send yourself annoying
emails/pages when it gets too high; we recently did a similar thing at
my current work because we had a similar problem (bad definition from
vendor caused rate spike).
>
> Apologies,
> ./brm
>
>
>
> Al Puzzuoli wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> Someone just attempted to reply to an email message I sent, and received
>> the below error. Any idea what may have caused this? I suppose there could
>> have been a virus involved; but I doubt it.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
|
