 |
 |
> I definitely do not, due to the hue and cry caused by even one false positive on an MSU message. Right - I'm receptive to this, which is why I posted the question. However, there's a trade-off between an issue that might happen infrequently to individuals (false positive from @msu.edu) and an issue that happens regularly to many people (spam). We share your current position (thanks for the response!), but I hope more people chime in so we can get a sense for what the community is doing. > But I have not noticed the increased spam you have been seeing, at all. Isn't that odd? I don't think so. The problem is subject to per department and per user variability. YMMV -Tony -----Original Message----- From: Kim Geiger [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:18 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Spam @msu.edu -- Kim Geiger WKAR Radio & Television, WKAR.org East Lansing, Michigan 517-884-4766 >>> On 8/13/2013 at 4:10 PM, "Cooke, Tony" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > NAG, > > For those of you maintaining email services; Do you scan email originating > from @msu.edu for spam? I definitely do not, due to the hue and cry caused by even one false positive on an MSU message. But I have not noticed the increased spam you have been seeing, at all. Isn't that odd?