Print

Print


I have to admit to getting a kick out of this latest thread.  A 
University is and always will be a University first and foremost.  A 
business does not grant degrees (with the exception of Subway-U ;)  A 
University does grant degrees.  If you take away the computers and 
behind-the-scenes paperwork/red-tape, and you take away the money 
changing hands, you still have people coming to a location to sit and 
listen and learn and argue.  At the end of that journey, they are still 
granted a degree.

The University (at least as a concept) still exists even if money does 
not.  Its like arguing that sports is a business.  You take away the 
ticket-holders and the concessions and the advertisements and the 
television and you are still left with sports.  It might not still be 
called Michigan State University and it might still not be called the 
Detroit Pistons, however people will still gather and learn and people 
will still play basketball.

This is not to say that there is no business at a University.  
Certainly, people with money have ideas that they want researched, and 
so they spend it on a certain area of study, and ideas get researched.  
The people with money sometimes make stipulations that they have a say 
in what gets reported, and I think here is where free speech may be 
questioned.

Academic Technology Services (or the Computer Center as you may 
remember) is part of the University, and we certainly do act as a 
business because people with money found a need for a support 
structure.  But again, you take us out of the picture and the University 
still exists.  I think this is what all of these kind folks who "come 
from the corporate world" fail to understand.  The University must run 
as a University first, and as a business second.  It is difficult to 
maintain a business sense in a world where higher-education is the 
ultimate goal.

Tuition is not the only place where a University (such as MSU) makes 
money.  There are also private donations, grants from private companies, 
contracts from private companies, and government grants and subsidies.  
Of course as you mentioned there are also miscellaneous fees, and who 
knows what else.

I appreciate your thoughts on this matter, and I'm left wondering if 
your rant helps me or hurts me as one of the "non-hippies" who works 
here (I'm not even 30 yet, and I do not wear tie-dyed anything).  I 
think it certainly doesn't help me.  But what I appreciate is that it 
could only be said so openly at a University where there is 
*free-speech*.  Good luck pulling that off over at whatever company you 
work for... for the entire company to see.  I think that's why sites 
like www.wikileaks.org exist.

Perhaps I am not addressing whatever concerns that originally set you 
off, but the meat of your argument seems to be that we are a business.  
My whole point is that, while yes, we do have business goals, we are 
certainly not a business, we are a University.  We are not Michigan 
State Incorporated, we are Michigan State University.  It should stay 
that way for a long time after you and I are gone, provided they do not 
make any poor business moves ;-)

Regards,
./brm