 |
 |
As a Groupwise(GW) user, I think it is just OK. Groupwise doesn't seem to support caldav. This is annoying to me because the biggest thing I use GW for is email and calendaring. It locks me into using the GW client. While the GW web client is, to me, preferable to using the desktop client. I find it lacking in customization. If we are serious about adhering to open standards, as I think we should, I don't see that GW offers us much more than Outlook/Exchange. I don't think GW is a bad piece of software, but it could be better. --Ray On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Scott Foreman wrote: > I missed this post ... I couldn't agree with Don more, GroupWise > has been the most stable, scalable email platform I could ever want > to administer. Run on SLES or OES2 makes it all the better. One of > our Novell servers has been up for over 200 days, the last time we > patched and rebooted was for the daylight savings update in October > or November. I also heard at a conference that if you pay for SLES > maintenance through Novell that you could install and run GroupWise > for free but this probably works differently since we have a site > license. The GroupWise 7.x web interface is very robust and easy to > use, also includes calendaring. >