Print

Print


My concern about Microsoft's Virtual Server offering is that Microsoft is
currently becoming rather heavy handed in trying to get users to subscribe
to their annual license model.  I would hate to be locked into one of their
Virtual Server systems and find that it became a leverage to move me towards
an annual license fee.  I am currently testing VMWare's offerings and like
the fact that I can integrate Linux into the mix with relative ease,
including pre-built linux VM's.

 

  _____  

From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MSUNAG] Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager

 

Nag-

 

I watched about an hour long recorded webcast by Microsoft on the up and
coming SCVMM part of the System Center family and my first impressions are.
WOW!  It is currently RTM and should be out soon.and paired with the updates
coming when Windows Server 2008 is released.and then again 120 days after
that with the full update to Virtual Server it seems very nice.  We are
beginning to think about starting to work towards a production class Virtual
environment.currently we use VS2005 for testing but it's not redundant
enough for production with only one server.

 

I wonder if any of you other MS guys/gals out there have heard about this
(if not then you should check it out) and or messed with it at all and am
interested to hear some of your impressions.

 

/Ehren

 

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Michigan State University

1209 A Biomed Phys Sci

 

[log in to unmask]

517-355-9200 x2569

 



__________ NOD32 2584 (20071010) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com