 |
 |
I've been using it on Windows since day one, actually since before the release of 0.1, when it was just a nightly build. I dont have one single complaint about it. I've only used it with IMAP though, never POP. I have a few IMAP folders that are over 20mb with several thousand messages, and it never chokes, or complains. I've definitely had to deal with problems in the early builds, but its been rock solid for me for quite awhile. I also installed into the Engineering Public Labs, and I havent had any user complaints, but they might not be using it either. Peter J Murray wrote: > This is a continuation of yesterday's question, but I'm getting > frustrated with Outlook and it's little glitches, and people want spam > filtering. Most of our users have thousands upon thousands of messages > stored in folders (some have 70k plus), and is why we don't use IMAP. > Is Thunderbird stable enough and 'corruption-proof' to handle such > loads? No one really uses any Outlook specific features such as > calandar and the like. I personally like it, but don't know how it will > do. Any comments? -- Steve Foley <[log in to unmask]> DECS PC Administration <[log in to unmask]> Michigan State University