MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  February 2015

MSUNAG February 2015

Subject:

Active Directory/Group Policy Vulnerability

From:

David Graff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David Graff <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:58:26 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

Hopefully you have already seen the email IT Services sent out about the
group policy vulnerability and patch/mitigation with this month's patches.
This is a big one, and anyone running AD needs to take the time to deploy
the new mitigation group policy.

A link to the bulletin is here:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms15-011.aspx

Computers enrolled in AD automatically parse the SYSVOL and NETLOGON shares
on their domain controllers for policies and scripts which are then executed
with administrative/root rights. Its possible to hijack that session and
have arbitrary code executed on your systems from a malicious user on your
network. There are a number of ways to be hit by this:

1) Workstations and laptops connecting over a wifi network could be easily
hijacked by a user on the same network. Requests to a domain controller
could be intercepted, allowing complete rooting of the system.

2) Wired networks are vulnerable from a malicious actor conducting an arp
poisoning attack against the network switches, intercepting connections to
the domain controllers and proving those systems with malicious group
policies/scripts.

3) If you do not practice proper network segmentation and leave your servers
and/or domain controllers in the same broadcast domain as workstations and
network ports are in unsecured locations, all your servers could also be
compromised the same as your workstations.


This patch backports functionality in Server 2012R2/Win8.1 to Vista/2008 and
above allowing specific servers or SMB share names to use additional server
validation and message signing to prevent this type of hijack attack. SMB
validation, signing, and encryption are all supported on XP/2003, but have
to be enable globally to all SMB connections which may cause compatibility
issues. This patch and its hardening features allows you to enable the
additional features on a per-server or share basis to prevent compatibility
issues.

Details on configuring the SMB Hardening feature are here:
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/3000483

If you are running a 2008 or newer domain controllers and most of your
systems are Vista/2008 or above, I would advise proceeding with pushing MS's
recommended configuration of the following:

\\*\NETLOGON	RequireMutualAuthentication=1, RequireIntegrity=1
\\*\SYSVOL	RequireMutualAuthentication=1, RequireIntegrity=1


For folks still on 2003 domain controllers, I recommend not setting the
RequireIntegrity option. Your domain controllers will not be able to handle
dynamically negotiating the integrity signing and all your client systems
will likely need a second reboot after the settings apply.

As with anything like this, please test things out before you apply it to
the whole domain. These are client-side security settings, so you can test
things out on a few systems in a test OU before you do the full deployment.
Good luck!

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager