> I definitely do not, due to the hue and cry caused by even one false positive on an MSU message.
Right - I'm receptive to this, which is why I posted the question. However, there's a trade-off between an issue that might happen infrequently to individuals (false positive from @msu.edu) and an issue that happens regularly to many people (spam). We share your current position (thanks for the response!), but I hope more people chime in so we can get a sense for what the community is doing.
> But I have not noticed the increased spam you have been seeing, at all. Isn't that odd?
I don't think so. The problem is subject to per department and per user variability. YMMV
-Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Geiger [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Spam @msu.edu
--
Kim Geiger
WKAR Radio & Television, WKAR.org
East Lansing, Michigan
517-884-4766
>>> On 8/13/2013 at 4:10 PM, "Cooke, Tony" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> NAG,
>
> For those of you maintaining email services; Do you scan email originating
> from @msu.edu for spam?
I definitely do not, due to the hue and cry caused by even one false positive on an MSU message.
But I have not noticed the increased spam you have been seeing, at all. Isn't that odd?
|
