Here here!
-- dkm
At 7/6/2011 02:34 PM Wednesday, Richard Wiggins wrote:
>Official Web sites should adhere to Web standards. Specifically, in
>the year 2011, if a content provider claims that the content they
>serve needs to adhere to a browser, such as IE8 instead of IE9, that
>content provider is incompetent. Their content needs to adhere to
>HTML 5. Any such content provider needs to be relieved of duty, and
>their managers and administrators as well.
>
>/rich
>
>On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, STeve Andre'
><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>The 4G requirement is just not correct for XP, since only 3G is usable there.
>
>As for Acrobat, there might be some difference between 10.0, the intermediate
>version and 10.1. A friend found an interesting rendering problem that was
>resolved in the latest version which was in the first 10 version. Maybe this
>is the problem?
>
>Has anyone used Foxit with EBS?
>
>--STeve Andre'
>
>
>On 07/06/11 10:36, Aldrich, Dak wrote:
>Ok. Now this is getting frakking ridiculous.
>
>We had problems about 3 weeks ago and we called the EBS
>helpdesk. We called because it was taking 5 and 8 minutes to get
>any kind of faculty appointment approved in the system.
>
>We were told that users HAD to have the LATEST version of
>Adobe... Correct me if I'm wrong... ISN'T ACROBAT X THE LATEST
>VERSION?... AND they had to have 4 gigs of memory. (Yes, that's
>exactly what I was told. And like a dip, I didn't get a name of the
>agent we spoke to.)
>
>So, what is it? Is Acrobat X the problem? Or is it not? I really
>wish we could get consistent answers between the web site, helpdesk,
>and everyone else that's throwing answers around out there.
>
>My problem right now is that ALL users, except for one, are having
>the same problem. It's taking 5 to 8 minutes to process an approval
>for a faculty appointment. That means nothing to me, but the users
>that do it here say that's unacceptable. Only one machine is able
>to process them in any acceptable amount of time.
>
>All machines have either XP Pro SP3 or Windows 7 SP1, IE 8, Acrobat
>Reader X and SAP. The only two differences between these machines
>are the OS and that some have 2 gigs memory, others have 4
>gigs. Otherwise, they all have the same version of IE, SAP and Acrobat Reader.
>
>Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>
>-dak
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kim Geiger [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:11 PM
>To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] EBS HR Module, SAP GUI and Adobe Acrobat
>
>On 7/5/2011 at 4:02 PM, Lee
>Duynslager<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>Hey has anybody else out there had problems with any of the PDF forms
>Used with the SAP GUI in the HR module in EBS, after the latest
>updates to Windows?
>
>
>
>
>
>What did you do to resolve the problems?
>
>You know you can't have Acrobat X installed, right?
>
>--
>Kim Geiger
>Information Technologist
>Broadcasting Services
>Michigan State University
><tel:517-432-3120%20x%20429>517-432-3120 x 429
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This message is only for the intended recipient(s).
>If you are not the named recipient you should not read,
>distribute or copy this email. Any views or opinions
>expressed in this email are those of the author and do
>not represent those of Michigan State University or the
>College of Music. Any information obtained from or
>contained in these emails is confidential. No
>information will be shared or given to any persons
>outside of the appropriate department(s).
>
|