 |
 |
Here here! -- dkm At 7/6/2011 02:34 PM Wednesday, Richard Wiggins wrote: >Official Web sites should adhere to Web standards. Specifically, in >the year 2011, if a content provider claims that the content they >serve needs to adhere to a browser, such as IE8 instead of IE9, that >content provider is incompetent. Their content needs to adhere to >HTML 5. Any such content provider needs to be relieved of duty, and >their managers and administrators as well. > >/rich > >On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, STeve Andre' ><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote: >The 4G requirement is just not correct for XP, since only 3G is usable there. > >As for Acrobat, there might be some difference between 10.0, the intermediate >version and 10.1. A friend found an interesting rendering problem that was >resolved in the latest version which was in the first 10 version. Maybe this >is the problem? > >Has anyone used Foxit with EBS? > >--STeve Andre' > > >On 07/06/11 10:36, Aldrich, Dak wrote: >Ok. Now this is getting frakking ridiculous. > >We had problems about 3 weeks ago and we called the EBS >helpdesk. We called because it was taking 5 and 8 minutes to get >any kind of faculty appointment approved in the system. > >We were told that users HAD to have the LATEST version of >Adobe... Correct me if I'm wrong... ISN'T ACROBAT X THE LATEST >VERSION?... AND they had to have 4 gigs of memory. (Yes, that's >exactly what I was told. And like a dip, I didn't get a name of the >agent we spoke to.) > >So, what is it? Is Acrobat X the problem? Or is it not? I really >wish we could get consistent answers between the web site, helpdesk, >and everyone else that's throwing answers around out there. > >My problem right now is that ALL users, except for one, are having >the same problem. It's taking 5 to 8 minutes to process an approval >for a faculty appointment. That means nothing to me, but the users >that do it here say that's unacceptable. Only one machine is able >to process them in any acceptable amount of time. > >All machines have either XP Pro SP3 or Windows 7 SP1, IE 8, Acrobat >Reader X and SAP. The only two differences between these machines >are the OS and that some have 2 gigs memory, others have 4 >gigs. Otherwise, they all have the same version of IE, SAP and Acrobat Reader. > >Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. > >-dak > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kim Geiger [mailto:[log in to unmask]] >Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:11 PM >To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] EBS HR Module, SAP GUI and Adobe Acrobat > >On 7/5/2011 at 4:02 PM, Lee >Duynslager<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >Hey has anybody else out there had problems with any of the PDF forms >Used with the SAP GUI in the HR module in EBS, after the latest >updates to Windows? > > > > > >What did you do to resolve the problems? > >You know you can't have Acrobat X installed, right? > >-- >Kim Geiger >Information Technologist >Broadcasting Services >Michigan State University ><tel:517-432-3120%20x%20429>517-432-3120 x 429 > >------------------------------------------------------- >This message is only for the intended recipient(s). >If you are not the named recipient you should not read, >distribute or copy this email. Any views or opinions >expressed in this email are those of the author and do >not represent those of Michigan State University or the >College of Music. Any information obtained from or >contained in these emails is confidential. No >information will be shared or given to any persons >outside of the appropriate department(s). >