MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  June 2008

MSUNAG June 2008

Subject:

Re: XP or Vista Antivirus 2008 ..... Here is one mechanism of infection

From:

STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:48:13 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

   Inline comments:

On Friday 27 June 2008 08:26:27 Brian Martinez wrote:
> Ehren Benson wrote:
> > I am of course being OS Agnostic here, but any OS is only as secure as
> > its user.  It's not Microsoft's or anyone else's responsibility to make
> > it so that all attempts by end users to make their machine as insecure as
> > possible by being ignorant fail.
> >
> > In our department in the past the number of machines compromised have
> > been probably 8 to 1 Linux due to people being irresponsible with their
> > root password.
>
> How do you say "I am of course being OS Agnostic here" and then go on to
> compare Windows and Linux compromises, attempting to make Windows sound
> better...???
>
> I don't know that I agree with Steve about "the builders are to blame."
> If my machine gets compromised I blame myself in the majority of
> situations.  0sec/0day exploits are another story altogether...

If I said or implied that 100% of the problem was the builder, I apologize.
But it *is* a diseased op system, and difficult to deal with properly.

>
> But the problem you make sound like a bigger issue on Linux is EXACTLY
> the same problem that is a *HUGE* deal on Windows.  When you install
> Windows, or when you load it for the first time on your newly purchased
> computer the default account no matter what its called has Administrator
> privileges.  And since there are [let me pull a number out of thin air
> here] 100 times more Windows machines as there are Linux machines, I see
> it as a 100 times bigger problem.  Albeit the same problem, but its the
> scope that is worse.  That is how you get these zombie/bot networks.

It's at least 1000 times.  But the problem is even worse on Windows, in
that there is software out there that really fights if the user is not the
administrator.  I don't know of any software like that in unix-like land.

>
> I don't doubt for a minute that there are zombie networks comprised of
> Unix boxen, but I highly doubt there are 100s if not 1000s of zombified
> unix networks like you have with Windows.  And that's just simply
> because as I said there are X number more Windows machines in existence
> than there are Unix.  Having said that I guess I can see why Steve says
> "the builder is to blame."  Or at least the realtor (marketing
> department) who works for the builder.

I think if you looked at the number of deadly IP stack problems (RPC
and the like) on Windows, it dwarfs the number of similar problems on
Linux, and is even better for the BSDs, AIX and Solaris.  This is not to
say those other op systems haven't had problems, but I don't expect
to hear of remote code execution problems in OpenBSD.  I do, from
past experience with Windows.

>
> At any rate, the blame is probably almost always going to lie in several
> places not just the end user and not just Windows or Linux or OSX or
> _Whatever_OS and furthermore most people aren't going to blame
> themselves anyway.  As a generality "users" are almost always out of
> their element, they often carry a "well I didn't think that could happen
> to me" attitude.  Hell, even I carry that attitude and I know better!

Well, sure.  But look at Macs and how much better they've stood up.
Of course Apple needs to be looking at the Darwin code base better
than they have been for problems, but at least they have Net/Open/
FreeBSD to look at.  Thats a huge advantage.

>
> *frustrated with your post*
> ./brm - a windows admin stuck inside a unix admin's body
>
>
> (P.S.  It has been awhile since I've installed a fresh Linux box, but it
> seems like they typically make you create a non-root user during the
> install.)
> (P.P.S.  I am currently running NO anti-virus software on my Vista
> machine.  Nor have I been running any for a few months.  I know who to
> blame if/when I get a virus, *me*)

Vista does show signs of being better!  If it wern't so odd in other aspects
I'd have more hope for it.

I am *REALLY* hoping that Windows 7 will do things like break with binary
compatibility, among other things.  Once MS cuts ties to supporting
legacy code they can make a better OS.  I think there are enough good
people there that they can do that.  But the marketing people have to
get out of the way.  We might be hearing interesting stores of internal
battles, soon.

--STeve Andre'

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager