MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  June 2008

MSUNAG June 2008

Subject:

Re: XP or Vista Antivirus 2008 ..... Here is one mechanism of infection

From:

STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:24:46 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (202 lines)

You are absolutely right that leaving the windows and doors open on ANY
op system will lead to problems.

The problem with MS though, is that its such an unsecure base that folks
who obey the rules still get hammered. And, just reading what to do isn't
enough. One great example is that if you have a new XP machine and
hook it up to your cable modem to get all the patches you need, the
chances of getting infected with something is huge. This just happened
to two friends who got ThinkPads--the needed patches took long enough
that each got something different. Have a phone connection and want
patches? Thats almost a 100% chance of getting hit. You need a little
nat box for this. We all know this. Is there anywhere that MS or any
OEM explains this? I haven't seen it.

Then of course the next layer is the stuff like leaving root passwords
around, etc. That wasn't the point of my rant--before you can get to
that level of unsecureness, you have to deal with the first part. ;-)

I tend to think or security and this gigantic OR gate.

--STeve Andre'

On Friday 27 June 2008 07:55:36 Ehren Benson wrote:
> And then of course there are the folks that leave the windows and doors
> wide open to allow anything in that might accidentally wander that way, be
> it salesmen knocking on doors (adware), bugs (viruses). And there are even
> some who willingly accept the bugs, feed them and allow them to reproduce
> (clicking on any and all weird attachment on unknown emails or popups)
>
> :)
>
> I am of course being OS Agnostic here, but any OS is only as secure as its
> user. It's not Microsoft's or anyone else's responsibility to make it so
> that all attempts by end users to make their machine as insecure as
> possible by being ignorant fail.
>
> In our department in the past the number of machines compromised have been
> probably 8 to 1 Linux due to people being irresponsible with their root
> password.
>
> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
> Windows Systems Administrator
>
> [log in to unmask]
> 517-884-5469
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of STeve Andre' Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] XP or Vista Antivirus 2008 ..... Here is one
> mechanism of infection
>
> Heh. This is not a new issue with me. Having used Windows since
> Windows/286 days I've had some time to think on this. Somewhere
> I have the original box for it.
>
> Using your analogy, there is room for blame on several levels. The
> first would be the builder of the house--people in general do not under-
> stand what makes a good one, not underneath. With one main house
> builder that overshadows all the others, it takes some determination
> to not go with that builder.
>
> Certainly one can place blame on the thief, too. Regardless of the
> type of house it isn't ethical to attempt to barge in. I can't blame
> the neighborhood; it simply is. Law enforcement isn't capable of
> dealing with the sheer numbers of thieves: there are too many of
> them.
>
> The owner of the house doesn't know, at least 99% of the time
> that there are other builders out there and a house that leaks is
> not inevitable. That number is rising; I have had people at public
> places like Panera see that my login wasn't Windows and wanted
> to know what it was. That never happend before this year.
>
> Leaving the analogy, the situation for Windows has gotten radically
> worse in the last year. Symantec said that they found more new
> malware items in the last 1.5 (or 2?) years than the previous 18.
> Attacks never get worse, they evolve. Bot nets are incredibly
> large and getting better. Go to clamav.net and watch the number
> of new entries grow each day.
>
> The situation is getting worse. Rapidly.
>
> --STeve Andre'
>
> On Thursday 26 June 2008 22:46:06 Charlot, Firmin wrote:
> > There is no doubt that there are strong feelings here. Why don't we step
> > back for a moment, cool off and take a look at this analogy just for fun.
> > If a house (user's computer) gets broken into because windows (WindowsXP,
> > Vista, etc) were breached whose at fault? Do you blame the house, the
> > windows, the thief (hacker) ,the neighborhood (network) ,law enforcement
> > (IDS, IPS, Firewalls, Anti-virus, Anti-spyware, Anti-SPAM, etc) or even
> > the owner?
> >
> > Firm.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MSU Network Administrators Group on behalf of Troy Murray
> > Sent: Thu 6/26/2008 4:35 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] XP or Vista Antivirus 2008 ..... Here is one
> > mechanism of infection
> >
> > Amen
> >
> > -t
> >
> > On Jun 26, 2008, at 3:21 PM, STeve Andre' wrote:
> > > No, more like terminally disgusted. We're talking about a company
> > > that
> > > has created a world-wide standard of an operating system, which has
> > > helped the world considerably. I remember the days of individual op
> > > systems, all entirely incompatible and generally strange.
> > >
> > > But MS did not care about security. Not one bit. I have talked with
> > > three software people who once worked there who were publically
> > > excoriated by none other than Bill Gates himself, for expressing "The
> > > dumbest idea I've ever heard" when talking about issues that related
> > > to security and reliability. How MS has managed to avoid massive
> > > ostracism for creating this OS--or rather, how MS managed to teach
> > > the average person that a computer "naturally" blows up, slows down,
> > > gets sick, crashes and is difficult to use is one of the most amazing
> > > PR jobs in history.
> > >
> > > Windows has some good points. Its existence has created a playing
> > > field unequal to anything that has ever come before it.
> > >
> > > But at an unbelievable cost: hundreds of billions of dollars in total
> > > on "security" and security related incidents over Window's lifetime.
> > >
> > > THAT is what I am disgusted at.
> > >
> > > --STeve Andre'
> > >
> > > On Thursday 26 June 2008 14:58:14 Ehren Benson wrote:
> > >> Haters.... :/
> > >>
> > >> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
> > >> Windows Systems Administrator
> > >>
> > >> [log in to unmask]
> > >> 517-884-5469
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > >> On
> > >> Behalf Of STeve Andre' Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:27 PM
> > >> To: [log in to unmask]
> > >> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] XP or Vista Antivirus 2008 ..... Here is one
> > >> mechanism of infection
> > >>
> > >> That was me...
> > >>
> > >> --STeve Andre'
> > >>
> > >> On Thursday 26 June 2008 14:09:30 Tom Rockwell wrote:
> > >>> Interesting Diane Rehm show yesterday
> > >>> http://wamu.org/programs/dr/08/06/25.php
> > >>>
> > >>> Listen for the caller from MSU unloading on Windows. :-)
> > >>>
> > >>> -Tom
> > >>>
> > >>> John Valenti wrote:
> > >>>> Which humans are you referring to?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> (I'm assuming you mean the people who click to follow a random link
> > >>>> in my rant...)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Where is the outrage about the crappy OS? We are now in a world
> > >>>> where
> > >>>> people infect their computers by clicking on a link, and we blame
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> victims? I could see the Internet developing in the late '80s
> > >>>> and if
> > >>>> you would have told me it would turn out similarly to the current
> > >>>> Windows situation I would have laughed at you. What set of
> > >>>> intelligent people would let things get to this state!
> > >>>> -John
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On June 26, at 2:14 PM June 26, Robert Kriegel wrote:
> > >>>>> Yup,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Unfortunately, its the humans whose risky behavior security
> > >>>>> patches
> > >>>>> still refuse to stick too. I guess Ron White is right.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Bob Kriegel
> > >>>>> Animal Science
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> At 11:42 AM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
> > >>>>>> Holy crud -- I got a message about a disaster in China that has
> > >>>>>> killed "millions", and a web site to see video. At that point
> > >>>>>> I was
> > >>>>>> offered beijing.exe, which clam didn't know about as of an hour
> > >>>>>> ago. So its definitely spreading.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --STeve Andre'

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager