What about if we could sign-up for a "digest" of new posts for day/
week/month, then if we see something we like we can participate or
subscribe?
--
Troy Murray
On May 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Brian Martinez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Surato, Michael S. wrote:
>> However, that breaks the conversation rather than facilitate it.
>> What I
>> was hoping is that the forum technology would be able to have both
>> push
>> and pull technology that would be flexible. If this is not the case,
>> then we will have this problem again.
>>
>>
> Perhaps you can consider me the troll here, but I'd like to think
> otherwise. I'd like to legitimately offer up IRC as a resource
> again (would I really be doing my job as the IRCop to not be pushing
> this service?) It is great for both active and passive communicae
> and a small percentage of folks on MSUNAG have joined since the last
> time I've mentioned it a year ago. The only other better service I
> can think of is Jabber. However, we do not have an instance of this
> available as of yet.
>
> Forums are not going to be the NAG replacement, but rather it will
> be a bit better at being a knowledge-base of sorts. Naturally
> MSUNAG will continue to exist well into the next epoch.
>
> *shrug* Just my three cents.
>
> ./brm
|
