 |
 |
What about if we could sign-up for a "digest" of new posts for day/ week/month, then if we see something we like we can participate or subscribe? -- Troy Murray On May 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Brian Martinez <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Surato, Michael S. wrote: >> However, that breaks the conversation rather than facilitate it. >> What I >> was hoping is that the forum technology would be able to have both >> push >> and pull technology that would be flexible. If this is not the case, >> then we will have this problem again. >> >> > Perhaps you can consider me the troll here, but I'd like to think > otherwise. I'd like to legitimately offer up IRC as a resource > again (would I really be doing my job as the IRCop to not be pushing > this service?) It is great for both active and passive communicae > and a small percentage of folks on MSUNAG have joined since the last > time I've mentioned it a year ago. The only other better service I > can think of is Jabber. However, we do not have an instance of this > available as of yet. > > Forums are not going to be the NAG replacement, but rather it will > be a bit better at being a knowledge-base of sorts. Naturally > MSUNAG will continue to exist well into the next epoch. > > *shrug* Just my three cents. > > ./brm