The answer is no. The suggestions offered either did not work, or they
were no improvement over what we already had. As some of you may know,
it is possible ACNS to tweak an individual account, thereafter
preventing user configuration of SPAM processing. Tweaking is not a
good option for us since multiple accounts may need the modification.
However, ACNS is considering making SPAM processing the default in a new
system, and "insert ***SPAM*** in subject line", "Move to SPAM box" and
"Block SPAM" would just be options in addition to "SPAM processing enabled".
Thanks,
-Stefan
Stefan Ozminski wrote:
> (previously submitted question with updates, reformatting, and a
> subject line)
>
> I would like to have the option of enabling Spam processing on my
> mail.msu.edu mail without having ***SPAM*** put in subject lines. And
> I would like to have a solution that non-technical users can
> implement. The objective is to take advantage of the headers inserted
> by Spam Assassin using a workstation email client without having to
> login to Webmail to check for non-spam messages in the SPAM folder. I
> don't want my subject lines modified, and I don't want to maintain a
> Trusted Senders list in Webmail. I do want my client side address
> book to be my trusted senders list to compare against messages marked
> as Spam by SpamAssassin.
>
> Does anyone know of a way to enable the Malmail Setting "Move to SPAM
> folder" and have the Spam automatically put in the Inbox instead? I
> tried a filter for "X-SPAM-LEVEL starts with *****", but it does not
> move messages to the Inbox.
>
> Or does anyone know of a way to retrieve mail from the SPAM folder
> using POP3 (we have an Imail server which allows us to use a special
> username-mailbox syntax to retrieve mail from a folder other than Inbox).
>
> Or do you have a better suggestion? Note that the parameters of the
> solution are that it be "within the mail.msu.edu system", and that it
> uses POP3. An IMAP solution will not give me what I want. A solution
> that involves telnet or ftp will be too complicated.
>
> Thanks,
> -Stefan
>
>
|
