MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  September 2007

MSUNAG September 2007

Subject:

Re: Maybe mail.msu.edu should offer sponsored mail

From:

Laurence Bates <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Laurence Bates <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 4 Sep 2007 07:38:18 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (155 lines)

I would argue that email is a significant part of the university's branding
and shaping of a student's experience at MSU. It defines who "we" are much
as the football stadium does. Yes, there is a cost to student email but
there is also a cost to having a campus. We could do everything online or
rent UofM's stadium but then it would not be "us" and students would not
leave as MSU students, and more importantly, would not excel in the
non-academic things that MSU offers.

There are always ways to make more money from students. We could raise the
cost of USB cables from $3 to the $30 that surrounding stores charge but
that would communicate something to our students that would be quite
negative. I appreciate the MSU Computer Store selling cables at reasonable
prices. That is the honorable thing to do and it represents consideration
for others.

If I were still a student at MSU, I think that I would appreciate them not
selling my wallet's potential to Google so that I could be pestered by
targeted ads. As a Father of three students, I did seriously consider
whether a college seriously cared for them and not just for the almighty
buck. I looked at the rooms and the seats and the meals that they provided,
and if I had had the opportunity, I would also have considered the email
system as an indicator of what a college was really trying to accomplish.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alec Warner [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 6:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Maybe mail.msu.edu should offer sponsored mail

Disclaimer: I work for Google as an SA and I'm an MSU alumnus.

I'm a bit unsure of a few things as I watch the numerous discussions
about replacing MSU's e-mail systems. I was a student at MSU just a
year ago, so I hope nothing has drastically changed in my absence
regarding e-mail lest I say something utterly silly.

A fundamental problem I see is that users want a one-stop-shop for
e-mail. All their mail goes to one place, they filter it there,
respond, delete, etc... For many users this is an IMAP or POP3 client
of some kind that connects to all their accounts, for others, it's a
web-based mail system. However even at MSU some students are given
multiple accounts.

I think many students (and students are whom I speak for, having never
been full time staff) dislike having multiple e-mail accounts. I had
3 (msu, cse, egr) all of which forwarded to egr (egr had the most
space) and later to gmail due to space. If we consider CSE students
also taking Engineering courses as outliers, that still leaves all
engineering students with two accounts. I am not aware of other
departments and whether or not they give mail accounts to
undergraduates. I question slightly why cse and egr give out e-mail
accounts to students at all; although I can imagine it was due to how
horrific mail.msu.edu was at one point in time (perhaps even now).

Going back to the one-stop-shop for e-mail; I don't think MSU should
be the place where students send their mail. Students send a lot of
e-mail (as you very well know) and maybe five or ten years ago it was
feasible to route and store e-mail for every student. However use of
e-mail has increased astronomically (not to mention spam, but we all
know how bad that is). Students don't often differentiate between a
school and personal account, often signing up with their school
account for non-educational things. This is not necessarily a bad
thing (we should encourage growth and learning and so forth) but it
presents interesting challenges when not only are you routing and
storing education-related mail, but someones facebook and myspace
updates as well.

So if I may present a few high level questions.

What is the goal of MSU's e-mail system (for students)?

There was a question earlier of 'What does MSU have to do to get
people to use our service?' in regards to space versus competing
services. Is having the students use MSU's e-mail a goal of MSU
e-mail?

Due to the flexibility of e-mail (forwarding, filtering, etc) students
can choose whatever service they want with regards to reading and
sending mail. This same flexibility makes it difficult to compete
with other services on certain points: space offered, speed of the
service, convenience (think remote users).

My guess as to the goal of MSU e-mail for students is to provide a
means for student / teacher / community interaction. E-mail is a
powerful tool and every student should have the means to use it.
However I don't think it is possible to 'win back' those students who
have already gone the webmail route. The 'competition' has more
space, is possibly faster, and certainly easier to work with from many
machines (no IMAP client required for webmail).

Is the fact that students are no longer using MSU's e-mail a concern?
Does it matter which e-mail service they use as long as the channels
for communication remain open? The only thing I can think of is
forwarding mail from MSU to Gmail might bring problems with FERPA, but
I am not familiar enough with FERPA to comment.

-Alec

On 8/30/07, Robert Kriegel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> A couple of days ago John Resotko posted a message in this thread with
the
> following URL that includes info about Goggle's FERPA compliance:
>
>
http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid5_gci1245576
,00.html
>
> This article indicates that as part of its FERPA compliance Google does
not
> scan student e-mail; hence they do not display targeted ads to students,
> just faculty and staff (still a large volume of e-mail).
>
> As for permanent MSU associated e-mail addresses, doesn't the MSU alumni
> association already do this with the existing system for their members?
> Many departments also do this for non-MSU employees (volunteers, etc.) who
> are closely affiliated with their programs. In the context of this
> discussion, I do not see a 'permanent' GMail account as a benefit of
> sufficient value to help sway the decision either way.
>
> Bob Kriegel
> systems analyst,
> Dept of Animal Science, MSU
>
> At 08:58 AM 8/30/2007, you wrote:
>
>
> The cost of outsourcing mail - is ads in the mail.
>
> The benefit to the outsourcer is income from scanning for hot words and
> putting in ads.
>
> if one puts ads in ten percent and charges $.001 per ad the outsourcer
> gets $1000. per million mails.
>
> How many mails does mail.msu.edu pass each day?
>
> Maybe we need to consider adding mails from potential employers or media
> companies. Or at least offer the option to students on an opt in basis.
>
> Yes, I know there are a LOT of reasons not to do that. ;-)
>
> One benefit of outsourcing is being left out of the current discussion.
> Permanent mail addresses. We can't offer that at present. Google, Hotmail,
> Yahoo, etc. can.
>
> Don Bosman
> Information Technologist
> Libraries, Michigan State University


__________ NOD32 2502 (20070904) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager