|
Use joomla (as it was mentioned first, the former name is Mambo),
They even have their own standalone-server for windows if you want to test
them out.
This cms is now the one with most developers.
Been trying using it, and put some in production.
All i can say is, this cms is excellent,
It allows you to write your own modules, easy installations & upgrades,
If you have some $$$ to run SQLSERVER & Windows, try Rainbow CMS, runs on
.NET
Joomla:
www.joomla.org
if you want to try and compare CMS,
try www.opensourcecms.com
they have every CMS ever heard from A-Z
-----Original Message-----
From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Bryan Murphy
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] CMS recommendation
I have to recommend against PHPNuke. While I was working at a local web
host it was the second most commonly exploited web app. PHPBB being the
first.
Mambo (or whatever the new spin off is called) is very very nice.
On 1/10/06 12:30 PM, "Sven Bohm" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to learn about content management systems, for a possible
> implentation at KBS. Personally I have experience with Plone and
> phpnuke. Both would take some work to customize. Macromedia's Contribute
> has been recommended, but it does not really qualify as a CMS in my book
> (ie. the only client side requirement is a browser). So I wanted to ask
> what kind of Content Mangement Sytems do you all use? Any
> recommendations for or against?
>
> Thanks,
> - --
> Sven Bohm -.- ..-. ---.. .-
> KBS-LTER Information Manager http://www.msu.edu/~bohms/public.2005
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDw+8l/1PKtSxCFBERAmjOAJ9cQ7/exFwVdG1rgVbvzHj6mp4jLACghWzY
> r923POSFTmIO7iy9v93kcE8=
> =K/oE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
