 |
 |
Use joomla (as it was mentioned first, the former name is Mambo), They even have their own standalone-server for windows if you want to test them out. This cms is now the one with most developers. Been trying using it, and put some in production. All i can say is, this cms is excellent, It allows you to write your own modules, easy installations & upgrades, If you have some $$$ to run SQLSERVER & Windows, try Rainbow CMS, runs on .NET Joomla: www.joomla.org if you want to try and compare CMS, try www.opensourcecms.com they have every CMS ever heard from A-Z -----Original Message----- From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bryan Murphy Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:39 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] CMS recommendation I have to recommend against PHPNuke. While I was working at a local web host it was the second most commonly exploited web app. PHPBB being the first. Mambo (or whatever the new spin off is called) is very very nice. On 1/10/06 12:30 PM, "Sven Bohm" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I'm trying to learn about content management systems, for a possible > implentation at KBS. Personally I have experience with Plone and > phpnuke. Both would take some work to customize. Macromedia's Contribute > has been recommended, but it does not really qualify as a CMS in my book > (ie. the only client side requirement is a browser). So I wanted to ask > what kind of Content Mangement Sytems do you all use? Any > recommendations for or against? > > Thanks, > - -- > Sven Bohm -.- ..-. ---.. .- > KBS-LTER Information Manager http://www.msu.edu/~bohms/public.2005 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFDw+8l/1PKtSxCFBERAmjOAJ9cQ7/exFwVdG1rgVbvzHj6mp4jLACghWzY > r923POSFTmIO7iy9v93kcE8= > =K/oE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----