Sorry, wrong link on the Linux virtual server project. It should have been
... http://linux-vserver.org/
On 9/16/05 3:34 PM, "Bryan Murphy" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On my last job we used the Linux Virtual Server Project (
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/) and later switched to Virtuozzo (
> http://www.sw-soft.com/en/products/virtuozzo/).
>
> Neither worked all that great for our purposes because each virtual
> dedicated server had a different client on it so it was always a fight over
> who got the most resources. The Linux virtual server project had no way of
> limiting cpu and ram consumption on a per virtual server basis hence the
> switch to virtuozzo. This took care of that problem by jailing each server
> into its own fixed amount of resources making it very slow by default (the
> smallest account was capped at 256megs of available physical memory).
>
> If you will be the owner of all virtual servers on a given physical server
> then the Linux virtual server project would be ideal (and is free).
>
> Hope that helped.
>
> /------------------------------------
> | Bryan Murphy
> | Computer and Network Coordinator
> | Plant Research Lab and Plant Biology
> | http://infotech.prl.msu.edu
> \------------------------------------
>
>
> On 9/16/05 3:21 PM, "Troy Murray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Just curious if anyone here on campus is using any type of server
>> virtualization software to consolidate servers in their department.
>> In particular something like VMWare Server ESX/GSX.
>>
>> Thanks,
|
