Amazed actually. Although I did get a lot less mail then I expected, today. ;-)
The IDP team is to be congratulated for their work to date and continued efforts on this.
Even if a few positives got bounced by the IDP system, the benefit to the network will be worth it. Unless of course it is the mail letting me know I realllly win'd the 419enlargercheapsoftwaremakeyourwifehappygetyourmortagehere lottery/freexxlg/buyonefreegetone lottery. But since I didn't purchase a ticket I guess I really won't win.
Thanks folks.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of suratomi
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Update on Intrusion Detection/Prevention testing
Are you complaining or complimenting? :)
+-------------------------------------------+
| Michael Surato |
| Resource Center for Persons |
| with Disabilities |
| Michigan State University |
| 120 Bessey Hall |
| East Lansing, MI 48824 |
| Voice: (517) 353-9643 Fax: (517) 432-3191 |
+-------------------------------------------+
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MSU Network Administrators Group
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bosman, Don
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:34 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Update on Intrusion Detection/Prevention testing
>
> So that's where all my mail went.
>
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MSU Network Administrators Group
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Doug Nelson
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:32 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [MSUNAG] Update on Intrusion Detection/Prevention testing
>
>
> To all interested parties:
>
> Our test of the campus border Intrusion Detection and
> Prevention system today has been successful. The decision
> has been made to continue the test through Friday and the
> holiday weekend, and possibly beyond that.
>
> Since enabling the IDP this morning, the system has blocked
> over 5,500 "critical" network events, and over 50,000 "major"
> network events. To the best of our knowledge, all of these
> are events that we would all want to block, and we are
> confident that there would be few, if any, false positives in
> these groups.
>
|
