Amazed actually. Although I did get a lot less mail then I expected, today. ;-) The IDP team is to be congratulated for their work to date and continued efforts on this. Even if a few positives got bounced by the IDP system, the benefit to the network will be worth it. Unless of course it is the mail letting me know I realllly win'd the 419enlargercheapsoftwaremakeyourwifehappygetyourmortagehere lottery/freexxlg/buyonefreegetone lottery. But since I didn't purchase a ticket I guess I really won't win. Thanks folks. Don -----Original Message----- From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of suratomi Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:45 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Update on Intrusion Detection/Prevention testing Are you complaining or complimenting? :) +-------------------------------------------+ | Michael Surato | | Resource Center for Persons | | with Disabilities | | Michigan State University | | 120 Bessey Hall | | East Lansing, MI 48824 | | Voice: (517) 353-9643 Fax: (517) 432-3191 | +-------------------------------------------+ > -----Original Message----- > From: MSU Network Administrators Group > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bosman, Don > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:34 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Update on Intrusion Detection/Prevention testing > > So that's where all my mail went. > > Don > > -----Original Message----- > From: MSU Network Administrators Group > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Doug Nelson > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:32 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [MSUNAG] Update on Intrusion Detection/Prevention testing > > > To all interested parties: > > Our test of the campus border Intrusion Detection and > Prevention system today has been successful. The decision > has been made to continue the test through Friday and the > holiday weekend, and possibly beyond that. > > Since enabling the IDP this morning, the system has blocked > over 5,500 "critical" network events, and over 50,000 "major" > network events. To the best of our knowledge, all of these > are events that we would all want to block, and we are > confident that there would be few, if any, false positives in > these groups. >