MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  January 2003

MSUNAG January 2003

Subject:

Re: BlackICE

From:

Lee Duynslager <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

MSU Network Administrators Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:15:51 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (84 lines)

>> Putting a "firewall" on the machine that winds up protecting
>> itself is something of a bad idea.  A firewall really wants to
>> be an entity which has all the packets in the network flowing
>> past it, where it makes determiniations about them.

>I'm going to have to disagree here - putting a firewall directly on a
>client or server system is a great line of defense.  If it is set up
>properly, it is a great aid to the defenses of that system.  I would
>liken a local system firewall to locks on the front door (or maybe
>better, the windows and side doors where you don't normally expect
>entry), whereas an enterprise-wide firewall is like a border check
>station at the city limits.  There are benefits to the border firewall,
>but as has been pointed out, it doesn't protect from the attack within.
>And one significant issue we face is that there are VERY few products
>available (count on one hand) which can even begin to handle a data
>stream of 800+ Mbps, which is our current Internet load (we'll need 2
>Gbps within a year, I'm sure).ug:

Shouldn't firewalls be like bottle necks ie.. the one location through which
the packets must travel before they get to the Computers that are behind it.
That way they can monitor these incoming and outgoing packets to check the
sources and destinations (addresses) of these packets.  This way you can
perform some type of egress filtering, and discard packets from certain
addresses and address ranges?  This can prevent hacking but also prevent the
hijacking of computers for use in a Denial Of Service Attack.

It is understandable that there is overhead in checking each and every
packet, and this could potentially slow down throughput.

I don't know about the way the university does it, but I know the major
government organizations do not use software firewalls installed on each and
every separate computer.  They use a bottleneck approach to protect large
numbers of computers and ensure the validity of the configuration and
firewall rules.

Wouldn't it be more logical to have one firewall for a building or floor of
a large multi departmental building , instead of purchasing 55 copies of
black ice and having 54 different firewall configurations?

Lee Duynslager





Lee Duynslager
Michigan State University
Center for Integrated Plant Systems
Information Tech. Professional

(517)432-5296


-----Original Message-----
From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Doug Nelson
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: BlackICE

>
> Putting a "firewall" on the machine that winds up protecting
> itself is something of a bad idea.  A firewall really wants to
> be an entity which has all the packets in the network flowing
> past it, where it makes determiniations about them.

I'm going to have to disagree here - putting a firewall directly on a
client or server system is a great line of defense.  If it is set up
properly, it is a great aid to the defenses of that system.  I would
liken a local system firewall to locks on the front door (or maybe
better, the windows and side doors where you don't normally expect
entry), whereas an enterprise-wide firewall is like a border check
station at the city limits.  There are benefits to the border firewall,
but as has been pointed out, it doesn't protect from the attack within.
And one significant issue we face is that there are VERY few products
available (count on one hand) which can even begin to handle a data
stream of 800+ Mbps, which is our current Internet load (we'll need 2
Gbps within a year, I'm sure).


Doug Nelson                     [log in to unmask]
Network Manager                 Ph: (517) 353-2980
Computer Laboratory             http://www.msu.edu/~nelson/
Michigan State University

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager