Print

Print


----------

View this email in your browser
<https://mailchi.mp/law/perspective-370?e=763bcf158c>

哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看:
https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/columbia-fdi-perspectives
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=3c733d2c6f&e=763bcf158c>
.
*Columbia FDI Perspectives*
Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues
Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask])
Managing Editor: Matthew Conte ([log in to unmask])

*The Columbia FDI Perspectives are a forum for public debate. The views
expressed by the authors do not reflect the opinions of CCSI or our
partners and supporters.*

No. 370   November 13, 2023
*Unexpected opportunities to support investor-state dispute prevention
through the WTO Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement*
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=55189a4b38&e=763bcf158c>
by
N. Jansen Calamita* <#m_6066366071332254686__edn1>

Establishing mechanisms and create tools to promote dispute prevention are
an increasing priority for states. That said, states often struggle to
develop whole-of-government information regarding the operation of their
regulatory systems and the risks of claims that may be raised under their
investment protection treaty commitments. This, in turn, undermines
the development
of effective, evidence-based dispute-prevention mechanisms
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=f1ee0b5cb0&e=763bcf158c>.
The recently completed text negotiations
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=ca2b2238f5&e=763bcf158c>
of the WTO Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement (IFDA),
however, present states with unexpected opportunities to bolster their
dispute-prevention efforts.

At bottom, the IFDA is about improving administrative due process for FDI
in the countries that join the Agreement. Indeed, the stated goal of the
IFDA is the establishment of “rules and disciplines on investment
facilitation designed to enhance the transparency, efficiency and
predictability of the investment regulatory environment” for the purpose of
facilitating investment for development.[1] <#m_6066366071332254686__edn2>
Regulatory transparency, efficiency and predictability are not the only
concern of the IFDA, of course. Similar issues of administrative due
process arise in the context of investment-protection treaties, especially
with respect to the fair-and-equitable-treatment standard. Such issues
include the transparency of procedures and proceedings, clarity of the law
and decision making, fair administrative procedures (including the right to
be heard and the right to prompt decisions), administrative consistency,
and the availability of administrative review. And herein lies an
unexpected opportunity.

Under the IFDA, each developing and least developed country is expected to
conduct a whole-of-government “self-assessment” or “gap analysis” to
determine whether it will be able to meet the IFDA’s obligations, or
whether it will be necessary to use the IFDA’s “Special and Differential
Treatment” provisions and make reforms before taking on certain
commitments. To that end, the WTO is preparing a “Self-Assessment Guide”
designed to guide countries’ assessments.[2] <#m_6066366071332254686__edn3>
While the purpose of the self-assessment process is for countries to
identify their compliance levels and technical assistance needs with
respect to the IFDA, the information developed through the self-assessment
process is not only relevant to the IFDA, but it is also relevant to ISDS
dispute prevention.

Because of the close conceptual relationship between the commitments
contained in the IFDA and many of the obligations under
investment-protection treaties, the information that a state develops when
assessing the compliance of its current legal processes vis-à-vis the
IFDA’s obligations will be simultaneously relevant to an examination of
those legal processes through the lens of its investment-protection
obligations. As a consequence, even though the self-assessment process has
been established for the specific purpose of considering compliance with
the IFDA, the self-assessment process presents states with the additional
opportunity to better understand the investment treaty risks they face from
their administrative processes.[3] <#m_6066366071332254686__edn4>

Using the information gathered through the self-assessment process would
allow developing and least-developed states to formulate evidence-based
dispute-prevention policies, consider possible domestic reforms and
consider treaty reforms. That said, even with this information, the
effective development and implementation of dispute-prevention mechanisms
will remain markedly difficult
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=fe340e749b&e=763bcf158c>
for many states. Here again, however, the IFDA may provide an opportunity.

Under the IFDA it is contemplated that donor countries will provide support
to developing and least-developed countries for implementation and for the
self-assessment of their current levels of compliance with the IFDA’s
commitments. While the degree of support that is ultimately provided
remains to be seen, the synergy between issues relevant to the IFDA and
investment treaties creates an opportunity for donor countries to multiply
the value of their support by helping to build capacity with respect to
ISDS dispute prevention at the same time as they support self-assessments
and the implementation of the IFDA. As a result, not only does the IFDA
present opportunities for developing and least-developed countries, but it
also provides opportunities for donor countries to substantially increase
the impact of their contributions.[4] <#m_6066366071332254686__edn5>

------------------------------
* <#m_6066366071332254686__ednref1> N. Jansen Calamita (
[log in to unmask]) is Head, Investment Law & Policy, Centre for
International Law, and Research Associate Professor (CIL), Faculty of Law,
National University of Singapore. The author wishes to thank colleagues at
CIL for their valuable comments and Manjiao Chi, Federico Ortino and
Rodrigo Polanco for their helpful peer reviews.
[1] <#m_6066366071332254686__ednref2> WTO, “Investment Facilitation for
Development (IFD) Agreement”, INF/IFD/RD/136, 6 July 2023. The text of the
Agreement has not been made public.
[2] <#m_6066366071332254686__ednref3> WTO, “Self-Assessment Guide: Draft
Sample for Provision 5 of the Easter Text”, INF/IFD/RD/97, 9 March 2022.
[3] <#m_6066366071332254686__ednref4> According to a 2016 study
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=d17623d28d&e=763bcf158c>
of investor-state treaty disputes, examining 584 arbitration cases from
1990-2014, 61% of cases were triggered primarily by administrative measures.
[4] <#m_6066366071332254686__ednref5> It bears noting that the IFDA is
specifically drafted to prevent legal interaction among its commitments,
investment protection treaties and investor-state dispute settlement. (For
a review of the concerns raised by possible interaction, see George A. Berman,
N. Jansen Calamita, Manjiao Chi and Karl P. Sauvant
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=214492d308&e=763bcf158c>.)
Nevertheless, nothing in the IFDA would prohibit donor states from
providing assistance packages to developing and least-developed states that
not only address the IFDA, but also other issues like dispute-prevention
policy.
*The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the
following acknowledgment: “N. Jansen Calamita, ‘**Unexpected opportunities
to support investor-state dispute prevention through the WTO Investment
Facilitation for Development Agreement,**’ Columbia FDI Perspectives, No.
370, November 13, 2023. Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center
on Sustainable **Investment (*http://ccsi.columbia.edu
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=6627c77ea5&e=763bcf158c>*).”
A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable
Investment at *[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
For further information, including information regarding submission to the
*Perspectives*, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment,
Matthew Conte, [log in to unmask]

*Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives*
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=444c4cf078&e=763bcf158c>


   - No. 369, Karl P. Sauvant and Zbigniew Zimny, ‘How to get the best deal
   for massive FDI incentives
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=784e07f6d9&e=763bcf158c>,’
   *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, October 30, 2023
   - No. 368, Julien Chaisse, ‘Rethinking umbrella clauses in international
   investment agreements
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=80cb67c424&e=763bcf158c>,’
   *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, October 16, 2023
   - No. 367, Brian Egan and Katie Clarke, ‘CFIUS part II? The US moves to
   restrict outbound FDI to China
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=16725164db&e=763bcf158c>,’
   *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, October 2, 2023

*All previous FDI Perspectives are available at
https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/columbia-fdi-perspectives
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=83dfed8ede&e=763bcf158c>*
.

*Other relevant CCSI news and announcements*

   - *November 28, 2023:* CCSI's Fall 2023 International Investment Law and
   Policy Speaker Series concludes with a panel on “*The Reform and Role of
   ISDS in the Legalization and Legitimacy of the Investment Treaty Regime*.”
   Each session will allow for Q&A and discussion with the panelists. The
   series is sponsored by Arnold & Porter, with media sponsor TDM. *For
   more details, and to register, visit our website
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=b44977f55b&e=763bcf158c>*
   .
   - *Applications are now open* for our 2024 virtual Executive Training
   Program on Sustainable Investments in Agriculture
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=f12439b814&e=763bcf158c>,
   which will be held from May 7-17, 2024. The interdisciplinary program
   explores challenges and solutions for advancing sustainable investments in
   agriculture. It includes asynchronous and synchronous components, including
   short and interactive live sessions dedicated to engagement with course
   lecturers and participants from around the world. Applications will be
   considered on a rolling basis until March 15, 2024. *For more
   information, and to apply, visit our website
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=b53ae4079d&e=763bcf158c>.*

Karl P. Sauvant, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - Columbia Climate School
*Copyright © 2023 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All
rights reserved.*
[log in to unmask]

*Our mailing address is:*
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Columbia Law School - Columbia Climate School, Columbia University
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027

Add us to your address book
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/vcard?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a>


unsubscribe from this list
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a&e=763bcf158c&c=bca592bafb>
update subscription preferences
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a&e=763bcf158c&c=bca592bafb>


[image: Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp]
<http://www.mailchimp.com/email-referral/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=referral_marketing&aid=ab15cc1d53&afl=1>


-- 




*Karl P. Sauvant, PhD*


*Senior Fellow*
*Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment*
Columbia Law School, Columbia University
435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 825, New York, NY 10027
| p: (212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask]
| w: www.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia
<https://twitter.com/CCSI_Columbia>

"How to Get the Best Deal for Massive FDI Incentives
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4616026>", "The New
WTO Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4531684>", "The Limits
of Capacity Building for Investment Contract Negotiations
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4474456>", "Establishing
an Advisory Centre on International Investment Law: Key Challenges Ahead
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4389689>", *Investment
Facilitation for Development: A Toolkit for Policy Makers. Second Edition
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3830031>,* "Agenda for
Practice-oriented Research
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4103768>", "How Would
a Future WTO Agreement on Investment Facilitation for Development Encourage
Sustainable FDI Flows, and How Could it be Further Strengthened?
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4084032>”, "Green FDI:
Encouraging Carbon-neutral Investment
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3943705>", "More
Attention to Policies! Improving the Distribution of FDI Benefits
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3818974>", "Facilitating
Sustainable FDI in a WTO Investment Facilitation Framework: Four Concrete
Proposals <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3496967>", "An
Inventory of Concrete Measures to Facilitate the Flow of Sustainable FDI:
What? Why? How?
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3739179>", are available
at https://ssrn.com/author=2461782 .

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
---
You must be an active AIB member to post to AIB-L .  AIB-L has a moderator which checks messages for basic relevance. However, AIB does not edit or screen messages for accuracy or reliability of content.  All subscribers are recommended to perform their own due-diligence before responding to any requests or calls. AIB accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided.