Print

Print


View this email in your browser
<https://mailchi.mp/law/perspective-362?e=dd153d6a25>

哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看:
https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/columbia-fdi-perspectives
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=42ae4adcf4&e=dd153d6a25>
.
*Columbia FDI Perspectives*
Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues
Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask])
Managing Editor: Matthew Conte ([log in to unmask])

*The Columbia FDI Perspectives are a forum for public debate. The views
expressed by the authors do not reflect the opinions of CCSI or our
partners and supporters.*

No. 362   July 24, 2023
*30 years after the fall of Communism: lessons learned for inward FDI*
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=e7bebde13c&e=dd153d6a25>
by
Zbigniew Zimny* <#m_-8878852415060791668__edn1>

FDI paved the way for the successful transition of East European countries
into market economies. Starting from close to zero levels after the fall of
Communism in the early 1990s, FDI inflows into the group reached a peak of
$73 bn in 2007. The EU11 (11 CEE countries, members of the European Union:
Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia
(2004); Bulgaria, Romania (2007); Croatia (2013)), responsible for 8% of
the entire EU’s GDP
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=b3baa31e47&e=dd153d6a25>,
absorbed 15% of the total inflows
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a807f495fc&e=dd153d6a25>
into the Union during 2005-2008.[1] <#m_-8878852415060791668__edn2>
Importantly,
that FDI was export-oriented, deepening integration within the regional
market.

As elsewhere, the EU11 opened up to FDI, established investment promotion
agencies (IPAs) and offered generous incentives. Foreign investors
responded hesitantly and unevenly, as individual countries suffered from
financial instability, debt burdens and recession that lasted between a
couple (Estonia, Poland, Slovenia) and several years (in the others). Once
stability was restored and economic growth resumed, FDI inflows grew
rapidly everywhere until the Global Financial Crisis, then subsided in all
countries, to then recover in some over the past four years.

MNEs are  now omnipresent in almost all sectors and activities, and play
the most important role in exports of manufactures: their shares of exports
range from over 80% in Slovakia and Hungary; through 75% in Czechia and
Romania; more than 50% in Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Slovenia, and Croatia;
and over 40% in Latvia and Lithuania. Foreign firms in individual service
industries—though generally less important than in manufacturing (except
for telecommunications and information)—have contributed to modernizing
services.

The EU11 have made remarkable progress in  the three decades after the fall
of Communism.The group’s GDP (at purchasing power parity) per capita increased
from 35% of the German level in 1995 to 63% in 2021
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=09f161c653&e=dd153d6a25>,
with progress experienced by all members, though unevenly. In attracting
substantial export-oriented FDI, they have achieved in a short time what
many developing countries have sought for decades—and only few have
succeeded.

What explains this success?

At the outset, the EU11 had some advantages, such as high levels of
education. Moreover, while the manufacturing base was obsolete, they had
human resources adept at industrial processes. Importantly, the EU11
managed to implement, though at uneven pace, a set of policies that
resulted in simultaneous improvements of key FDI determinants, in
particular those that matter for export-platform investment.

   - Initially, the EU11 removed a big obstacle to FDI—chronic banking
   crises—by letting in foreign banks that soon dominated the banking sector
   in all countries but Slovenia. The entry of foreign banks was accompanied
   by regulatory reforms, including prudential supervision. Thus, the EU11
   used one type of FDI to improve determinants for other types of FDI.
   - The EU11 turned state-owned behemoths in infrastructure services (also
   important for FDI) into viable companies, some by selling to foreign
   investors and some by turning them into joint-stock companies. Over time,
   most unbundled industries suitable for competition, regulated the remaining
   monopoly segments, separated ownership from regulatory functions, and
   established independent regulators.
   - The EU11 all improved international logistics, crucial for
   export-oriented FDI, by investing in infrastructure, reducing obstacles to
   the movement of goods and facilitating shipments. As a result, the EU11,
   except for  Latvia and Slovakia, significantly improved their positions in
   the Logistics Performance Index
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=13e0869f8c&e=dd153d6a25>
   ranking. These improvements are mirrored in their recent relatively high
   scores
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=c252e4f96f&e=dd153d6a25>
   for trade facilitation measures,  ranging from 1.6 to 1.8 (out of 2).
   - The EU11 strengthened governance and economic institutions, and all
   markedly advanced in the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom ranking
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=f6c996605d&e=dd153d6a25>
   between 1990-1995 and 2010-2015. However, recently some declined in this
   and other similar rankings, mainly on account of populist governments.
   - The EU11 continued to invest in education, in particular at the
   tertiary level, laying the ground for FDI upgrading. Graduates of tertiary
   institutions are commonly hired by MNEs, many on the Fortune 500 list that
   have established thousands of affiliates in business services in the region.
   - Although the EU11 countries improved on many fronts important for FDI,
   they are rarely among leaders in rankings. This suggests that
   simultaneously tackling many FDI determinants and bringing them up to
   decent standards is more important than making one or two perfect.

A big factor that facilitated large and better FDI flows into the EU11 has
been their accession to the EU. The adoption of the EU’s regulatory
framework reduced the risk of investing, incentivized competition and
lowered the cost of attracting FDI. EU funds contributed to improving the
physical and institutional infrastructure. Free trade has triggered the
 relocation of industry from the West to the East, and FDI in the East by
outsiders, stimulating large export-oriented FDI. This demonstrates the
power of irreversible trade liberalization between high- and low-cost
countries: the EU11’s access to a large regional market has turned them,
with FDI playing its part, into export platforms.

As similar tight integration arrangements are not likely among developing
countries, a realistic policy lesson for them is to seek free trade
agreements with large developed countries, possibly with loose rules of
origin—apart from strengthening other FDI determinants, as the EU11 have
done.

------------------------------
* <#m_-8878852415060791668__ednref1> Zbigniew Zimny ([log in to unmask])
is Professor of Economics at the Academy of Finance and Business  Vistula
in Warsaw, Poland. The author is grateful to Khalil Hamdani for his useful
comments on an earlier version of this text, and he wishes to thank
Miroslav Jovanovic, Kalman Kalotay, Alexey Kuznetsov, and Magdolna Sass for
their helpful peer reviews.
[1] <#m_-8878852415060791668__ednref2> Author’s own calculations, based on
UNCTAD
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=c9108589b5&e=dd153d6a25>
and Eurostat
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=8dcfb928fe&e=dd153d6a25>
.
*The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the
following acknowledgment: “Zbigniew Zimny**, ‘**30 years after the fall of
Communism: lessons learned for inward FDI,**’ Columbia FDI Perspectives,
No. 362, July 24, 2023. Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center
on Sustainable **Investment (*http://ccsi.columbia.edu
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=b5f47c0f48&e=dd153d6a25>*).”
A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable
Investment at *[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

For further information, including information regarding submission to the
*Perspectives*, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment,
Matthew Conte, [log in to unmask]

*Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives*
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=3fe27d09fd&e=dd153d6a25>


   - No. 361, Charles Ho Wang Mak, “Ethical and legal implications of FDI
   in or near cultural heritage sites
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a2f7b1b566&e=dd153d6a25>,”
   *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, July 10, 2023
   - No. 360, Manjiao Chi, “Strengthening regional investment facilitation
   rulemaking in Asia: the why and the how
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=f8a399101e&e=dd153d6a25>,”
   *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, June 26, 2023
   - No. 359, Karl P. Sauvant, Vanessa S. W. Tsang and Louis T. Wells, “The
   limits of capacity building for investment contract negotiations
   <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=7aef7abce9&e=dd153d6a25>,”
   *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, June 12, 2023

*All previous FDI Perspectives are available at
https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/columbia-fdi-perspectives
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=43c68826cf&e=dd153d6a25>*
.
Karl P. Sauvant, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - Columbia Climate School
*Copyright © 2023 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All
rights reserved.*
[log in to unmask]

*Our mailing address is:*
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Columbia Law School - Columbia Climate School, Columbia University
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027

Add us to your address book
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/vcard?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a>


unsubscribe from this list
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a&e=dd153d6a25&c=a3c127c184>
update subscription preferences
<https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a&e=dd153d6a25&c=a3c127c184>


[image: Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp]
<http://www.mailchimp.com/email-referral/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=referral_marketing&aid=ab15cc1d53&afl=1>


-- 




*Karl P. Sauvant, PhD*


*Senior Fellow*
*Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment*
Columbia Law School, Columbia University
435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 825, New York, NY 10027
| p: (212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask]
| w: www.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia
<https://twitter.com/CCSI_Columbia>

"The Limits of Capacity Building for Investment Contract Negotiations"
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4474456>, "Establishing
an Advisory Centre on International Investment Law: Key Challenges Ahead
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4389689>", "Three
Reasons Why a WTO Agreement on Investment Facilitation for Development is
Important <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4285857>",
*Investment
Facilitation for Development: A Toolkit for Policy Makers. Second Edition
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3830031>,* "Agenda for
Practice-oriented Research
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4103768>", "How Would
a Future WTO Agreement on Investment Facilitation for Development Encourage
Sustainable FDI Flows, and How Could it be Further Strengthened?
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4084032>”, "Green FDI:
Encouraging Carbon-neutral Investment
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3943705>", "More
Attention to Policies! Improving the Distribution of FDI Benefits
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3818974>", "Facilitating
Sustainable FDI in a WTO Investment Facilitation Framework: Four Concrete
Proposals <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3496967>", "An
Inventory of Concrete Measures to Facilitate the Flow of Sustainable FDI:
What? Why? How?
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3739179>", are available
at https://ssrn.com/author=2461782 .

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
---
You must be an active AIB member to post to AIB-L .  AIB-L has a moderator which checks messages for basic relevance. However, AIB does not edit or screen messages for accuracy or reliability of content.  All subscribers are recommended to perform their own due-diligence before responding to any requests or calls. AIB accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided.