Print

Print





View this email in your browser

哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看:  https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/columbia-fdi-perspectives.

Columbia FDI Perspectives

Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues
Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask])
Managing Editor: Riccardo Loschi ([log in to unmask])


The Columbia FDI Perspectives are a forum for public debate. The views expressed by the authors do not reflect the opinions of CCSI or our partners and supporters.

No. 313   September 6, 2021
 
Social entrepreneurship has evolved in India, ranging from traditional micro-finance to technology breakthroughs delivering low-cost diagnostics and climate resilient crops. India needs a more robust approach to channel foreign long-term capital into these innovations, vital to attaining sustainable development for all.
 
Company law in India provides that domestic and foreign companies operating in India and meeting prescribed financial thresholds must spend at least 2% of their net profits on specified corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities.[1] In 2019-20, 59 foreign companies listed on India’s stock exchanges spent US$64 million on CSR, compared to the US$1.5 billion spent by 1,217 domestic companies.[2]
 
Indian law allows contributions to technology business incubators to upgrade infrastructure and support start-ups. Despite India’s need for technology start-ups delivering high social impact (e.g., telemedicine, virtual education), however, CSR spending on such technology incubators has been negligible. From 2015-2018, healthcare and education projects received on average US$302 and US$520 million, respectively, while technology incubators promoting social entrepreneurship received only US$2.5 million.[3]
 
Neither have foreign investors shown much interest in the social venture funds contemplated by India’s Securities and Exchange Board. These funds, which invest in social businesses and follow impact investment objectives, receive tax and structural incentives similar to venture capital funds. While social venture funds raised just US$140 million and invested just US$90 million in 2012-2019, venture capital funds raised US$1.2 billion and invested US$900 million in Indian businesses in the same period.[4] The risk-return payoff for social impact start-ups renders them unattractive for traditional venture capital funding (especially when structured as not-for-profits) due to restrictions on dividend distribution.
 
Also, India permits 100% FDI in renewable energy, affordable housing and medical device manufacturing. However, between 2000 and 2019, only US$9.1 billion and US$1.9 billion FDI has flowed into non-conventional energy and medical appliances respectively, while US$80 billion has flowed into financial and software technology, telecommunications, infrastructure, automobiles, and pharmaceuticals sectors.[5]
 
Funds could be channeled into social enterprises by promoting UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)in particular, regarding environmental, social and governance issues—into the investing parameters of India’s FDI Policy. Further, incorporating the UN Global Compact principles or the OECD guidelines for MNEs in the implementation of the FDI Policy could successfully intertwine environmental and socio-economic sustainability with industrial growth. The first step is to create awareness about active sustainable investment opportunities through the Invest India website and during roadshows promoting FDI into India. Global initiatives include the SDG Investment Forum and international investment conferences. Proposed policy measures for India’s FDI Policy could include: 
  • Promoting SDG-related sectors. Currently, investment opportunities on the Invest India website are promoted by sector or location. Sustainable FDI can be encouraged by highlighting SDG-aligned investment opportunities (i) within sectors (e.g., by promoting energy storage and micro-grid technology within the realm of energy and infrastructure); (ii) as a separate sector, cutting across themes (e.g., the promotion of livelihoods and rural development across the manufacturing and agriculture sectors); and/or (iii) across regions, including by focusing on the entrepreneurial level or attention to SDG-related sectors within states). Initiatives to-date include the Baseline Report of the SDGs India Index, which tracks the progress made by Indian States and Union Territories towards the 2030 SDG targets and the UNDP-Invest India SDG Investor Map.
  • Promoting social enterprises. A publicly available database of start-ups, especially those incorporating the SDGs in their business models, would help bring them to the forefront. A list of recognized start-ups, vetted by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, is already available on the Start-up India website. Improvements to this database could involve adding details about the start-ups’ area of operation, alignment with the SDGs, impact metrics (human rights, labor, environment, anti-corruption practices), and some basic financial highlights.
  • Combining sustainable FDI with CSR funds. Promoting technology business incubators to simultaneously attract FDI and CSR funds could support high risk projects employing deep science and technology with long gestation periods in emerging markets. Without such support, such SDG-aligned clean technology or affordable healthcare projects that rely on borrowing and subsidies, could face financial or bankruptcy risk, jeopardizing capital already invested and the well-being of underserved communities.
India’s policy efforts to streamline business processes improved its position on the Ease-of-Doing-Business and Global-Competitiveness indices. However, neglecting issues like climate change and poverty could harm the attractiveness of any country, regardless of its strong macroeconomic indicators. Encouraging sustainable and responsible FDI would therefore help ensure not only inclusive and sustainable growth, but also the country’s attractiveness for foreign investors.
 

* Shradha Mani ([log in to unmask]) is a recent MBA graduate, Columbia Business School (CO 2021). The author wishes to thank Premila Nazareth Satyanand for her valuable suggestions and Indira Rajaraman, Harsha Vardhana Singh and an anonymous peer reviewer for their helpful peer reviews.
[1] Including eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition, sanitation, promoting education, promoting gender equality, ensuring environmental stability, protection of national heritage, and rural development projects. Schedule VII of the 2013 Companies Act.
The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the following acknowledgment: “Shradha Mani, ‘FDI and CSR to promote social entrepreneurship and sustainable FDI: Lessons from India,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 313, September 6, 2021. Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (http://ccsi.columbia.edu).” A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment at [log in to unmask].
For further information, including information regarding submission to the Perspectives, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Riccardo Loschi, [log in to unmask].
 
Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives   
  • No. 312, Tomoko Ishikawa, “Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement,” Columbia FDI Perspectives, August 23, 2021.
  • No. 311, Matthew Stephenson, “The OFDI policy path and the product space,” Columbia FDI Perspectives, August 9, 2021
  • No. 310, Mario Mancuso, “CFIUS and China in the post-COVID environment,” Columbia FDI Perspectives, July 26, 2021
All previous FDI Perspectives are available at https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/columbia-fdi-perspectives.

Other relevant CCSI news and announcements
  • On September 16, 2021, the World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD), World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA) and Fixing the Business of Food (FTBF)* (*An initiative led by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), the Santa Chiara Lab at the University of Siena (SCL), the Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition (BCFN), and the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)), will host "Private Sector Alignment with the SDGs and Accountability to Achieve Food Systems Transformation," in support of the UN Food Systems Summit. For more details, and to register, visit our website here.
Karl P. Sauvant, Ph.D.
Resident Senior Fellow
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute
Ph: 
(212) 854-0689
Fax: (212) 854-7946
Copyright © 2021 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All rights reserved.
[log in to unmask]

Our mailing address is:
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp


--




Karl P. Sauvant, PhD

Resident Senior Fellow

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - The Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 825, New York, NY 10027
p(212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask]
wwww.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia

"Increasing Transparency in Investment Facilitation: Focussed Support is Needed", "A Multilateral Investment Facilitation Agreement can Help Advancing Development", Investment Facilitation for Development: A Toolkit for Policymakers, "More Attention to Policies! Improving the Distribution of FDI Benefits. The Need for Policy-oriented Research, Advice and Advocacy", "More and Better Investment Now!", "Facilitating Sustainable FDI in a WTO Investment Facilitation Framework: Four Concrete Proposals", "Multinational Enterprises and the Global Investment Regime: Toward Balancing Rights and Responsibilities”, “The WIR at 30: Contributions to National and International Policymaking", "An Inventory of Concrete Measures to Facilitate the Flow of Sustainable FDI: What? Why? How?", "Insulating a WTO Investment Facilitation Framework from ISDS", "The Case for an Advisory Centre on International Investment Law", "The Potential Value-added of a Multilateral Framework on Investment Facilitation for Development" are available at https://ssrn.com/author=2461782 .

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance: [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.