 |
 |
Please consider to circulate across AIB-L about reducing inequality within and among countries as to whether the presented issue in the pptx file should be a problem or not Summary: Two of the biggest firms want to expand their manufacturing operations in the USA. This presentation considers the increased inequality generated from product complexity and work competencies in order successfully run both business after manufacturing expansion. Is the increasing inequality presented in this scenario more harmful or more beneficial to the country? I am concerned whether such an economic scheme that generates inequalities should be considered as a weapon that could cause harm to large populations. Before Manufacturing Expansion: 100% population can do job complexity 1.33 40% population can do job complexity 4.57 20% population can do job complexity 7.14 After Manufacturing Expansion: 100% population can do job complexity 1.33 79% population can do job complexity 2.33 66% population can do job complexity 4.33 40% population can do job complexity 4.57 28% population can do job complexity 7.14 4% population can do job complexity 7.38 Alan Pan, CPA Recent Sample Publications: Pan, A. with D., Pan, Mutlu, B., & Rylander, D. (2020). Preventing brand name blunders in doing business across cultures: Theory and research. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Vol. 30(2): 115-146. By Taylor & Francis Group, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2019.1622435 Pan, A. Chapter 2: Financial Resources in the book by Pan, D., & Ingram, D.(2019). Olympics Duality: Theories, Practices, and Challenges in Multi-Sport Event Preparation. (390 full color pages, $99.95). Boston, MA: American Press. https://americanpresspublishers.com/PanOlympics.htm ____ AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business. For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp To post message: [log in to unmask] For assistance: [log in to unmask] AIB-L is a moderated list.