 |
 |
View this email in your browser <https://mailchi.mp/law/perspective-299?e=763bcf158c> 哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看： http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives. <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=aab53c7a8c&e=763bcf158c> *Columbia FDI Perspectives* Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues No. 299 March 8, 2021 Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask]) Managing Editor: Riccardo Loschi ([log in to unmask]) *The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: Stuck half-way?* <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=14d25d8ad1&e=763bcf158c> * <#m_405041178295699484__edn1> by Axel Berger and Manjiao Chi** <#m_405041178295699484__edn2> China and the EU agreed in principle on a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) on December 30, 2020, after 35 rounds of negotiations since 2014. In the EU (and the US), critical voices pointed at the uncertain enforceability of key provisions and the negative impact on cooperation between the EU and such key partners as the US vis-à-vis China. For China, the CAI is held as a diplomatic success. In fact, the recently published draft text <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=78fab2d13e&e=763bcf158c> suggests that the CAI is less comprehensive than the title indicates, and that important elements remain unresolved. As Europe is already open to Chinese investors, additional market opening is expected from China. EU efforts mostly focused on issues of limited market access, technology transfer and the regulatory environment. The CAI addresses these issues in the sections on investment liberalization and regulatory frameworks. China commits to opening its markets in some sectors, including electric vehicles and financial and air-transport services. However, one could ask whether China is not already unilaterally opening up these sectors, and the CAI just locks-in those reforms.[1] <#m_405041178295699484__edn3> Arguably, however, preventing the revocation of economic reforms in China is an important achievement in and by itself. Conversely, given Europe’s increasing scrutiny of Chinese investments, securing a high level of market access in Europe was high on the China’s agenda: while the EU does not make any substantial additional market access commitments to China, it guarantees the existing level of access. Securing market access and locking-in reforms may be important outcomes, but they are unlikely to substantially increase two-way investment flows. Potentially more important is the prohibition of forced technology transfer and joint venture requirements, which appear more comprehensive than what China agreed to in its WTO accession protocol or in the Phase One Deal with the US. In addition to technology transfer requirements imposed by the state, China and the EU also commit not to “directly or indirectly require, force, pressure or otherwise interfere with the transfer or licensing of technology between natural persons and enterprises”.[2] <#m_405041178295699484__edn4> Furthermore, the CAI includes a number of “level-playing-field” provisions that may improve the transparency of subsidies, enhance procedural transparency, predictability and fairness of regulatory and administrative procedures, and regulate the operations of state-owned enterprises. The section on sustainable development is an important outcome of the CAI negotiations. While sustainable development sections are common in EU’s trade agreements, the CAI is China’s first agreement with such a section. As the CAI offers the EU much less leverage compared to a fully-fledged free trade agreement (FTA), the inclusion of such a comprehensive chapter section is a success. But the obligations under this section are mainly based on the parties’ existing commitments under other international environmental and labor treaties. Moreover, the wording of several key provisions (providing that the parties “shall strive to ensure” or “shall make continued and sustained efforts”) characterize such obligations as “best-effort” in nature.[3] <#m_405041178295699484__edn5> However, the section on sustainable development establishes a standalone mechanism to resolve disputes, similar to that included in the EU-Republic of Korea FTA. Under the latter mechanism, an independent panel has recently issued a decision <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=e12e614512&e=763bcf158c> holding that Korea (i) has violated its commitment to comply with the principle of freedom of association and (ii) should make “continued and sustained efforts towards ratification” of the “key ILO conventions”. Whether violations of the sustainable development section provisions under the CAI can lead to the same outcome remains to be seen, in particular as some of the key labor provisions are less binding in nature. In addition to regular government-to-government consultations, the CAI also requires the parties to hold dialogues with civil-society organizations, which could be challenging as Chinese law <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=c0d700a1bf&e=763bcf158c> has strict limits on such organizations. This section may thus prove crucial for the ratification in the EU. If ratified, its practical effects would depend largely on good will, close cooperation and the usage of dialogue mechanisms. Lastly, the CAI does not include sections on investment protection and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). The EU’s insistence to replace ISDS with an Investment Court System <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=0bfa19a43c&e=763bcf158c> *,* as well as the ongoing multilateral discussions on a reform of ISDS, could explain this omission. While the parties will continue negotiating the sections on investment protection and ISDS and “endeavour” to conclude them within two years <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=8091e6bfce&e=763bcf158c> after the signature of the CAI, the 25 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with outdated ISDS rules between EU members and China remain in force and could possibly lead to unwanted ISDS claims. The CAI is stuck half-way in the development of China-EU bilateral investment relations. While it addresses important issues of market access, regulatory cooperation and sustainable development, it does not replace the old BITs, nor contribute to the overall reform of the international investment regime. Both parties should use the next two years to remedy this omission. ------------------------------ * <#m_405041178295699484__ednref1> *The Columbia FDI Perspectives are a forum for public debate. The views expressed by the author(s) do not reflect the opinions of CCSI or Columbia University or our partners and supporters. Columbia FDI Perspectives (ISSN 2158-3579) is a peer-reviewed series.* ** <#m_405041178295699484__ednref2> Axel Berger ([log in to unmask]) is a Senior Researcher at the German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE); Manjiao Chi ([log in to unmask]) is Professor and Founding Director, Center for International Economic Law and Policy (CIELP), Law School, University International Business and Economics (UIBE), China. The authors wish to thank Lauge Poulsen and Claudia Schmucker for their input and Julien Chaisse, Wen-Hua Shan and an anonymous peer reviewer for their helpful peer reviews. [1] <#m_405041178295699484__ednref3> See Lauge Poulsen, “The EU-China investment deal and transatlantic investment cooperation”, presented at the Shapiro Geopolitics Workshop, Jan. 25-26, 2021 <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=3a3ff94537&e=763bcf158c> . [2] <#m_405041178295699484__ednref4> See, e.g., CAI, Article 3(3). See also Simon Lester, “Forced technology transfer provisions in the CAI and the US-China Phase One deal”, in *IELP Blog*, Jan. 24, 2021 <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=ef0c8d876a&e=763bcf158c> . [3] <#m_405041178295699484__ednref5> See, e.g., CAI, Article 5(2)-(3). *The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the following acknowledgment: “Axel Berger and Manjiao Chi, ‘The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: Stuck half-way?,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 299, March 8, 2021”. Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (**www.ccsi.columbia.edu* <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=b832bad6c5&e=763bcf158c>*).” A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment at **[log in to unmask]* <[log in to unmask]>*.* For further information, including information regarding submission to the *Perspectives*, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Riccardo Loschi, [log in to unmask] *Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives* <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=d96c1d3b3c&e=763bcf158c> - No. 298, Karl P. Sauvant and Louis T. Wells, ‘Obsolescence of the obsolescing bargain: Why governments must get investor-state contracts right,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives, February 22, 2021 - No. 297, Maria Borga and Monika Sztajerowska, ‘Divestments by MNEs: What do we know about why they happen?,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives, February 8, 2021 - No. 296, Rachel Thrasher, ‘Room to move: Building flexibility into investment treaties to meet climate-change commitments,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives, January 25, 2021 *All previous FDI Perspectives are available at * *http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives/* <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=add5ba88d0&e=763bcf158c> *. * *Other relevant CCSI news and announcements* - CCSI has organized a Sustain What <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=d807b277d9&e=763bcf158c> webcast for *March 12, 2021*. Andrew Revkin, longtime New York Times journalist and founding director of the Earth Institute Initiative on Communication and Sustainability, will host a discussion examining how the Biden Administration is likely to (and should) approach trade policy at this critical time, to ensure a robust and timely response to the pandemic, restore trust in the WTO, and help multilateralism live up to its promise, especially at times when international cooperation is needed most. No registration is required. Visit our website <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=35f041228f&e=763bcf158c> for more details and the link to join the event. - *CCSI is accepting applications until March 31, 2021* for its Executive Training on Sustainable Investments in Agriculture, which will take place online June 15-25, 2021. Please visit our website <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=0ad2a388c2&e=763bcf158c> for more information, including on how to apply. Karl P. Sauvant, Ph.D. Resident Senior Fellow Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Columbia Law School - Earth Institute Ph: (212) 854-0689 Fax: (212) 854-7946 *Copyright © 2021 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All rights reserved.* [log in to unmask] *Our mailing address is:* Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) Columbia Law School - Earth Institute, Columbia University 435 West 116th Street New York, NY 10027 Add us to your address book <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/vcard?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a> unsubscribe from this list <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a&e=763bcf158c&c=f94f9a9691> update subscription preferences <https://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a61bf1d34a&e=763bcf158c&c=f94f9a9691> [image: Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp] <http://www.mailchimp.com/email-referral/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=referral_marketing&aid=ab15cc1d53&afl=1> ------------------------------ Spam <https://antispam.law.columbia.edu/canit/b.php?c=s&i=014BSHh3j&m=42f7b4919ba5&t=20210308> Not spam <https://antispam.law.columbia.edu/canit/b.php?c=n&i=014BSHh3j&m=42f7b4919ba5&t=20210308> Forget previous vote <https://antispam.law.columbia.edu/canit/b.php?c=f&i=014BSHh3j&m=42f7b4919ba5&t=20210308> -- *Karl P. Sauvant, PhD* *Resident Senior Fellow* *Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment* Columbia Law School - The Earth Institute, Columbia University 435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 825, New York, NY 10027 | p: (212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask] | w: www.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia <https://twitter.com/CCSI_Columbia> "Multinational Enterprises and the Global Investment Regime: Toward Balancing Rights and Responsibilities”, “The *WIR* at 30: Contributions to National and International Policymaking", "An Inventory of Concrete Measures to Facilitate the Flow of Sustainable FDI: What? Why? How?", "Note on the Costs and Financing of an Advisory Centre on International Investment Law", "Insulating a WTO Investment Facilitation Framework from ISDS", "Advancing Sustainable Development by Facilitating Sustainable FDI, Promoting CSR, Designating Recognized Sustainable Investors, and Giving Home Countries a Role", "Making FDI more Sustainable", "The Case for an Advisory Centre on International Investment Law", "The Potential Value-added of a Multilateral Framework on Investment Facilitation for Development", "International Investment Facilitation: By Whom and for What?" are available at https://ssrn.com/author=2461782 . ____ AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business. For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp To post message: [log in to unmask] For assistance: [log in to unmask] AIB-L is a moderated list.