 |
 |
Call for Papers for the Journal of Supply Chain Management 2021 Emerging Discourse Incubator Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Towards Decent Work Guest Editors: Vivek Soundararajan, Miriam Wilhelm and Andrew Crane Supervising Editor-in-Chief: Mark Pagell The topic for JSCM's fourthemerging discourse incubator(EDI) is Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Toward Decent Work. Decent work refers to “opportunities for work that is productive and delivers a fair income, security in the workplace and social protection for families, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organize and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity and treatment for all women and men” (ILO, 2019). The goal of decent work for all is enshrined in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals as SDG 8, ‘Decent work and Economic Growth’. Yet in many supply chains this goal remains elusive. For example, there is evidence that the supply chains of several prominent companies, such as Amazon, have not adequately addressed worker safety concerns in regards to the COVID-19 virus. For decades, studies on decent work across disciplines like development studies, geography, political science, sociology and management have focused on various topics including barriers to decent work, causes of indecent work, and measures to improve and maintain decent work (e.g. Anker et al., 2003; Barrientos, 2013; Blustein et al., 2016; Grandey et al., 2015; Sehnbruch et al., 2015). Insights from these studies have informed policies and practices across the globe, many of them focused on the governance of global supply chains. Research on working conditions in SCM is often conducted under the broader theme of sustainable supply chain management. Under this theme, research has focused on topics such as the supplier capabilities for social management (Huq et al., 2016), occupational health & safety (e.g. Cantor et al., 2017; Pagell et al., 2018), including that of emerging economy suppliers (Hamja et al., 2019), and the role of intermediaries in managing suppliers’ social practices (Wilhelm et al., 2016; Soundararajan & Brammer, 2018). Nevertheless, a closer look at these studies suggests that decent work and SCM scholarship have had very little interaction. Therefore, this emerging discourse incubator encourages further attention to the interface of decent work and supply chain management. A key feature of such research would be that it accounted for the supply chain context; both within and between organizations. Within an organization decisions about the composition and treatment of the workforce are often separate from supply chain decisions and these supply chain decisions often occur across multiple functions. Equally, supply chain decision makers often influence and are accountable not only for their own organization but also for what other organizations (often in other countries or in a remote supply chain tier) do. Guaranteeing decent work in a supply chain that is accountable to all of its stakeholders, including shareholders and managers, is highly complex, and research for this EDI should account for these complexities. Research Opportunities We seek high-quality empirical submissions that explore decent work in supply chains from diverse perspectives and that advance theory and practice in line with JSCM’s mission. While we are open to submissions using both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as purely conceptual papers, submissions must make signification theoretical contributions. Authors are explicitly encouraged to incorporate insights from the two recent Emerging Discourse Incubators in the Journal of Supply Chain Management on “Research at the Intersection of Supply Chain Management and Public Policy and Government Regulation”[1] (Fugate et al., 2019) and “Research Where the Focal Actor in the Network is Not a For-Profit Firm”[2] (Pagell et al., 2018) and connect them to the topic of decent work in global supply chains. Potential topics and research questions are listed below, but submissions do not need to be limited to these suggestions. In addition, we encourage authors to consider empirical settings beyond manufacturing, including health care, non-profit organizations, logistics, government agencies, information technology, and others. Possible topics include, but are not limited to: * Governance of decent work in supply chains * The role of supply chain intermediaries in decent work * The relationship between occupational health and safety and decent work in supply chains * The role of public policy on the quality of working conditions in supply chains * The relationship between socio-economic or gender inequalities and decent work in supply chains * The influence of institutions and industry on decent work in supply chains * Supply chain responses to forced labor, human trafficking and modern slavery regulation * Research methods to explore decent work in supply chains Across these topics, submission might answer questions such as: * When, how and why can private governance mechanisms be particularly effective in ensuring decent work in supply chains? * When, how and why can multi-stakeholder collaborations effectively ensure decent work in supply chains? * What roles do supply chain intermediaries such as sourcing agents play in enabling decent work in supply chains? * What are the challenges of extending OHS in global supply chains? * How are socio-economic inequality and decent work in supply chains interlinked? * How are gender inequality and decent work in supply chains interlinked? * How should organizations address safety and privacy concerns when using technology to monitor and resolve decent work challenges in the supply chain? * How are firms responding to different types of new regulatory demands related to modern slavery/forced labor? And is this legislation effective for ensuring decent work in supply chains? * What are the methodological, ethical, and safety challenges for researchers who seek to study decent work in supply chains? What are suggested solutions to these challenges? Timeline January 2021: Invited papers and guest editors’ introduction expected to appear online to initiate the discourse January 2021-January 2022: Submission window for normal submissions. You can submit any time in between January 2021 and January 2022. And there is no cap on the number of articles we accept, as the main idea is to promote the discourse. Please direct any queries to guest editors Vivek Soundararajan ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>), Miriam Wilhelm ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>) and Andrew Crane ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>) or JSCM co-editor Mark Pagell ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>) See here for the Editors' introductory video on the call and process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYwn8WQkN_M See here for a recording of a webinar on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsANYuw6uDE References Anker, R., Chernyshev, I., Egger, P., Mehran, F., & Ritter, J. A. (2003). Measuring decent work with statistical indicators. International Labour Review, 142(2), 147-178. Barrientos, S. W. (2013). ‘Labour chains’: analysing the role of labour contractors in global production networks. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(8), 1058-1071. Blustein, D. L., Olle, C., Connors-Kellgren, A., & Diamonti, A. J. (2016). Decent work: A psychological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 407. Cantor, D.E., Corsi, T.M., and Grimm, C.M. (2017). The impact of new entrants and the new entrant program on motor carrier safety performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 97, 217-227. Fugate, B., Pagell, M., & Flynn, B. (2019). From the Editors: Introduction to the Emerging Discourse Incubator on the Topic of Research at the Intersection of Supply Chain Management and Public Policy and Government Regulation. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(2), 3-5. Grandey, A. A., Rupp, D., & Brice, W. N. (2015). Emotional labor threatens decent work: A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(6), 770-785. Huq, F. A., Chowdhury, I. N., & Klassen, R. D. (2016). Social management capabilities of multinational buying firms and their emerging market suppliers: An exploratory study of the clothing industry. Journal of Operations Management, 46, 19-37. Pagell, M., Wiengarten, F., Fan, D., Humphreys, P. & Lo, C.K., 2018. Managerial time horizons and the decision to put operational workers at risk: The role of debt. Decision Sciences. Pagell, M., Fugate, B., & Flynn, B. (2018). From the Editors: Introduction to the Emerging Discourse Incubator on the Topic of Research where the Focal Actor in the Network is not a for-profit Firm. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(2), 1-2. Sehnbruch, K., Burchell, B., Agloni, N., & Piasna, A. (2015). Human development and decent work: why some concepts succeed and others fail to make an impact. Development and Change, 46(2), 197-224. Soundararajan, V., & Brammer, S. (2018). Developing country sub-supplier responses to social sustainability requirements of intermediaries: Exploring the influence of framing on fairness perceptions and reciprocity. Journal of Operations Management, 58, 42-58. Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016). Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 42-60. ________________________________ [1]https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1745493x/2019/55/2 [2] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1745493x/2018/54/2 Kind Regards, Dr. Vivek Soundararajan Associate Professor in International Management School of Management University of Bath United Kingdom Phone: +44 (0) 1225 384362 Tweet: @Vivek_Soundar ____ AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business. For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp To post message: [log in to unmask] For assistance: [log in to unmask] AIB-L is a moderated list.