*** Apologies for any cross-postings ***
Call for Papers: Good Work: Eroding and New Standards in a Changing World
Guest Editors:
Sven Hauff, Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg
Daniela Rastetter, University of Hamburg
Special Issue
The changing context of work – e.g. though globalisation, intensification of competition, deregulation, growth in employment flexibility, technological changes, digitalization – increasingly triggers debates about the quality of working life and concerns
about the well-being of employees. Observations of precarious forms of employment or increasing demands and intensification of work thereby often elicit nostalgic memories of the apparently ‘good old days’ where work was characterized by full-time employment,
an adequate income, a permanent contract, and social insurance. However, these ‘old’ standards of ‘good work’ did not apply to all employees and even in the ‘good old days’, work was often characterized by strict hierarchy and low influence, where employees’
interests were largely neglected. Here, modern forms of employment could lead to improvements by providing, for example, more autonomy, involvement, flexible working hours, a better work life balance, and inclusion.
The question of how to evaluate the changes in the world of work is not easy and there are manifold perspectives how to define the standards of ‘good work’. One perspective could be to identify the work and
employment conditions that are actually increasing or threatening employee well-being. A particular challenge here is to consider the different dimensions of employee well-being, which includes aspects like physical and mental health, satisfaction, engagement
or fairness. Another perspective could be to confront the new developments to the aspirations and values of employees. The latter are also changing since new generations enter the labour market, since women increasingly participate in the labour force, or
because migration movements lead to an increasing diversity. Finally, one could contrast the changes with the current regulations in labour and social law concerning employee protection rights, working time and wage standards, social security, and representation
of employees’ interests.
In this Special Issue we want to bring together research that addresses the issue of eroding and new standards of ‘good work’ and we encourage researchers to share their thoughts with us. Contributions should address one or more of the
following questions:
Deadline
Full papers for this special issue of management revue – Socio-Economic Studies must be submitted by
December 30, 2019. All contributions will be subject to double-blind review. Papers invited to a “revise and resubmit” are due
June 31, 2020. The publication is scheduled for issue 2/2021. Please submit your papers electronically via the online submission system at
http://www.mrev.nomos.de/ using “SI Standards of Good Work” as article section.
Submission Guidelines
Manuscript length should not exceed 8,000 words (excluding references) and the norm should be 30 pages in double-spaced type with margins of about 3 cm (1 inch) on each side of the page. Further, please follow the guidelines on the journal’s website (http://www.mrev.nomos.de/guidelines/).
Hoping to hear from you!
Sven Hauff
Daniela Rastetter
References
Fieseler, C., Bucher, E., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2019). Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital
Labor on Crowdworking Platforms. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 987–1005.
Findlay, P., Warhurst, C., Keep, E., & Lloyd, C. (2017). Opportunity Knocks? The Possibilities and Levers for Improving Job Quality. Work and Occupations, 44(1), 3–22.
Grote, G., & Guest, D. (2017). The case for reinvigorating quality of working life research. Human Relations, 70(2), 149–167.
Noon, M., Blyton, P., & Morrell, K. (2013). The realities of work: Experiencing work and employment in contemporary society (4th. ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rubery, J., Keizer, A., & Grimshaw, D. (2016). Flexibility bites back: the multiple and hidden costs of flexible employment policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 235–251.
Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P.,
Duman, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). How Does the Digital Transformation Affect Organizations? Key Themes of Change in Work Design and Leadership. management revue – Socio-Economic Studies, 29(2), 114–138.
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Simon
Fietze
Associate Professor
Editor-in-Chief of
management
revue - Socio-Economic Studies
(listed in ESCI, Scopus, ABS 2018)
Programme Responsible
for the Bachelor
"Global Business Relationship"
Receive
our new IER newsletter
(in Danish!)
T
+45 6550 1748
Syddansk Universitet/University
of Southern Denmark
Institut for Entreprenørskab
og Relationsledelse/Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management
Alsion 2, A2
6400 Sønderborg
Danmark
|
Latest
publications:
Kattenbach,
R., & Fietze, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial
orientation and the job demands-resources model. Personnel Review, 47(3), 745-764. DOI:
10.1108/PR-08-2016-0194
Gretzinger, S., Fietze,
S., Brem, A., & Ogbonna, T. (2018). Small-scale entrepreneurship – understanding behaviors of aspiring entrepreneurs in a rural area. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(1), 22-42. DOI:
10.1108/CR-05-2017-0034
Matiaske, W., & Fietze,
S. (Eds.) (2017). Human
Resources, Labour Relations and Organizations.
A European Perspective. Special Edition of management revue - Socio-Economic Studies.
Baden-Baden:
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Fietze,
S., & Boyd, B. (2017). Entrepreneurial
intention of Danish students: A correspondence analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(4). DOI:
10.1108/IJEBR-08-2016-0241