THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
CALL FOR PAPERS
Chinese Multinationals in the New Era of Globalization:
The Belt-and-Road Initiative amidst Rising Anti-globalization Sentiment
Submission Deadline: October 15, 2018
Liang Wang, University of San Francisco, USA, Coordinating Editor
Haifeng Yan, East China University of Science and Technology, China
Xiaohua Yang, University of San Francisco, USA
Francesco Ciabuschi, Uppsala University, Sweden
William Wei, Grant MacEwan University, Canada
Thunderbird International Business Review is pleased to invite submissions to a special issue, which will address issues faced by Chinese multinationals in the new era of globalization, when their international expansion is facing threats from the rise of anti-globalization sentiment across the globe, as well as opportunities from China¡¯s Belt-and-Road Initiative.
The accelerating internationalization of emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) has urged management scholars to understand how and why these firms differ from MNEs from developed economies (Bonaglia, Goldstein, & Mathews, 2007; Ramamurti, 2012) and whether they are theoretically distinct (Hernandez & Guill¨¦n, 2018), in terms of their motivation (Luo & Tung, 2007), strengths and weaknesses (Madhok & Keyhani, 2012), strategy (Luo, Sun, & Wang, 2011), among other things. While liability of foreignness is a challenge for both developed and emerging-economy multinationals, liability of country of origin (COO) is primarily an issue for emerging economy multinationals (Muralidharan, Wei & Liu, 2017). In this growing body of literature in particular, scholars are calling for a better understanding of what is ¡°Chinese¡± about Chinese foreign direct investment and Chinese multinational enterprises (CMNEs) (Buckley et al., 2007; Deng, 2012; Deng, 2013; Deng, Yang, Wang, & Doyle, 2017), and how this translates into unique models and business strategies (Child & Rodrigues, 2005; Boisot & Meyer, 2008; Rui & Yip, 2008).
As Ramamurti and Hillemann (2018) posit, despite still being infant rather than mature MNEs, CMNEs have grown much faster than their Western counterparts in the past. A series of different factors have contributed to the high speed and large scope of CMNEs¡¯ internationalization: the leapfrogging advantages of being late-movers, favorable Chinese government policies, and more importantly, a favorable global context for internationalization (Ramamurti, 2012; Ramamurti & Hillemann, 2018); the rise of outsourcing; the modularization of global value chains, which could be even further accelerated by the Fourth Industrial Revolution and China¡¯s Belt and Road Initiative (Yang, Roddy, Lewis & Moise, 2018); the codification of knowledge; the gradual concentration and globalization of retailing; the more fluid international market for talent and professional services; and the increasing open market for corporate control in many countries (Williamson & Zeng, 2009, p. 81).
Despite the insights learned from existing studies, however, we believe that CMNEs and EMNEs in general have entered into a new era of globalization with both threats and opportunities, and that their corresponding strategies in the new era will have profound impacts on the global economic landscape, and on the Chinese economy in particular. First, the traditionally pro-free-trade Western society is witnessing an unprecedented wave of anti-globalization sentiment which, in some countries, has been translated into government policies such as the Trump administration¡¯s ¡°Buy American, Hire American¡± policy, and are having impacts on MNE strategy, location, and operations. As such, it is questionable whether the favorable global context for internationalization that has blessed the rise of CMNEs and EMNEs in general will be maintained. Second, in contrast, its rise to the second largest global economy gives China the ambition and resources to shape the process of globalization according to its own pace. One notable example is the Belt-and-Road Initiative, which promises to boost economic connectivity and cooperation among Eurasian countries at a grand scale. This opens opportunities to CMNEs but also challenges them to respond to more complexities in the environment, including divergent institutions (Tan & Wang, 2011), informal economy (De Castro, etc., 2014), and other issues. Lastly, the more recent escalating trading tension between the U.S. and China provides additional complexity to CMNEs. For example, Huawei, the flagship Chinese high-tech MNE, has been effectively banned from the American market, and ZTE, another Chinese telecom giant, is now in turmoil due to the export ban issued by the U.S. government.
How do CMNEs respond to opportunities and threats in the new era of globalization? What are the Chinese characteristics of their strategy? How are CMNEs¡¯ management and foreign subsidiary strategies evolving in a time of global change? How do their responses shape the process of globalization? In this special issue we welcome papers addressing these issues and related topics.
Topics of Special Interest:
¡¤ What are the threats and opportunities for Chinese firms to engage in globalization of business and the Belt and Road projects?
¡¤ Participation of CMNEs, EMNEs, and MNEs from developed economies in the Belt-and-Road Initiative
¡¤ CMNEs entering emerging markets as well as developed economies
¡¤ The Chinese characteristics of CMNE strategies
¡¤ What are the liabilities of institution of CMNEs? And how do they impact CMNEs?
¡¤ How are CMNEs¡¯ management and corporate strategies changing in order to meet new global opportunities and threats?
¡¤ How is the relationship between CMNEs¡¯ headquarters and foreign subsidiaries changing to support new strategies?
¡¤ How are subsidiary level strategies and processes contributing to CMNEs¡¯ further global expansion?
¡¤ Strategic responses of CMNEs to the U.S.-China trade tension, and the global anti-globalization sentiment.
¡¤ How do Chinese firms respond to competition from foreign and informal firms?
¡¤ How do CMNEs deploy UN sustainable development goals and corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to build up competitive advantages?
¡¤ How do CMNEs participate in global supply chains?
The topics listed are meant to be illustrative; submissions on any topic that relates to the theme of Chinese multinationals in the new era of globalization are encouraged. Submissions should be prepared in accordance with Thunderbird International Business Review¡¯s style guide and submitted toby September 1, 2018.
Be sure to indicate that it is for the special issue, Chinese Multinationals in the New Era of Globalization: The Belt-and-Road Initiative amidst the Rise of Protectionism. The authors of submissions are invited to attend the Academy of International Business China Chapter conference in Beijing, China, to be hosted by East China University of Science and Technology and co-hosted by the University of San Francisco, May 26-27, 2018. At this conference, authors will receive development feedback from the editorial team and discussants. For more details of the conference, please contact the conference organizing committee at . The special issue is tentatively scheduled to be published in 2019.
For additional information contact:
Liang Wang, PhD,, Coordinating Editor
TIBR Managing Editor,
Boisot, M. & Meyer, M. (2008). Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organizational Review, 4(3), 349-36
Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Mathews, J. A. (2007). Accelerated internationalization by emerging markets¡¯ multinationals: The case of the white goods sector. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 369-383.
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499-518.
Child, J. & Rodrigues, S. (2005). The internationalisation of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 381-410.
De Castro, J. O., Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. (2014). Shades of grey: how do informal firms navigate between macro and meso institutional environments? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1), 75-94.
Deng, P. (2012). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A critical review and future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4): 408-427.
Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 26-40.
Muralidharan E., Wei W. and X. Liu (2017). Integration by Emerging©\Economy Multinationals©\ Perspectives from Chinese M&As, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol 59 (4)
Rui, H. & Yip, G. (2008) Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 213¨C226.
Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC Strategic Responses to Ethical Pressure: An Institutional Logic Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3): 373-390.
Williamson, P. J., & Zeng, M. (2009). Chinese multinationals: Emerging through new global gateways. In R. Ramamurti, & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets: 81-109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, Roddy, Lewis and Moise, (2018). One Belt, One Road, One World: Where is US Business Connectivity? In China's Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization, Zhang, et al, eds. Forthcoming.
Managing Editor, TIBR
Manager, Thunderbird Case Series
Mobile: +1 602.430.7358
Thunderbird School of Global Management at ASU | 400 E Van Buren
Ste 800 MC1221 | Phoenix AZ, 85004-2262 USA • thunderbird.asu.edu