Print

Print


*Karl P. Sauvant, PhD*
*Resident Senior Fellow*
*Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment*
Columbia Law School - The Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 825, New York, NY 10027
| p: (212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask]
| w: www.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia
<https://twitter.com/CCSI_Columbia>


The Evolving International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Ways
Forward (E15 Task Force policy options), "China's outward FDI and
international investment law", "Policy options for promoting FDI in
the LDCs", “The negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on
Transnational Corporations: Experience and lessons learned”, and
*Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options
for the Future are* available at
http://www.works.bepress.com/karl_sauvant/.


View this email in your browser
<http://us6.campaign-archive1.com/?u=ab15cc1d53&id=0b1c16c02a&e=6f8fc3f180>

哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看:
http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives.
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=1dbedebb95&e=6f8fc3f180>


*Columbia FDI Perspectives*

Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues
No. 168  February 29, 2016
Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask])
Managing Editor: Maree Newson ([log in to unmask])



*Can India emulate China in attracting and benefitting from FDI?*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=ba5e3c4086&e=6f8fc3f180>
by
Karl P. Sauvant and Daniel Allman*** <#401302484__edn1>


Just four months after his election in May 2014, Prime Minister Narendra
Modi launched the “Make-in-India” campaign.  The event was broadcast across
the globe, with a clear message to foreign investors: India was ripping up
the red tape and rolling out the red carpet.  The campaign is aimed at
“transform[ing] India into a global design and manufacturing hub,”
measuring its success by the “opening up of key sectors … to dramatically
higher levels of Foreign Direct Investment [FDI].”[1] <#401302484__edn2>
How is India doing in this respect, compared to China, which achieved
remarkable success through a similar strategy?

In 1980, China’s FDI inflows (US$57 million) were less than three-quarters
of India’s inflows (US$79 million).[2] <#401302484__edn3> By 2014, China’s
FDI inflows (US$129 billion) outstripped India’s (US$34 billion) by almost
four times.[3] <#401302484__edn4> Measures of inward FDI stock tell the
same story: by 2014, India’s (US$252 billion) was about a quarter of
China’s (US$1,085 billion) and, for that matter, of Singapore’s (US$912
billion).[4] <#401302484__edn5>

The three key FDI determinants explain the story:


   - China’s economy and infrastructure grew much faster than India’s,
   making China much more attractive to foreign investors and initiating a
   virtuous cycle: FDI contributes to growth, and growth attracts FDI.  It is
   indicative that foreign affiliates generate over half of China’s exports.
   - This combined with a progressively more welcoming FDI framework: China
   ranks higher than India on the World Bank’s “doing business” index, the
   World Economic Forum’s “global competitiveness” index and the Milken
   Institute’s “global opportunity” index.[5] <#401302484__edn6>
   - China established an extensive investment-promotion infrastructure,
   with investment promotion agencies (IPAs) at all levels of government, to
   attract FDI and provide various aftercare services to foreign investors.
   Increasingly, red carpet replaced red tape, while, simultaneously, efforts
   were made to improve FDI’s contribution to China’s development.


Given the size and growth of its market, India has the potential to attract
considerably more FDI than it has in the past—as reflected in the fact that
India has ranked among the top 10 (if not top five) countries in seven of
the eight “FDI confidence” indices prepared by A.T. Kearney since 2004.[6]
<#401302484__edn7> Since these indices are based on the assessment of
corporate executives, the business community clearly sees India’s FDI
potential.

How to realize this potential?  What can India learn from China’s
experience?


   - As always, the economic determinants are fundamental.  As India
   promotes growth and improves its infrastructure, it too can initiate a
   virtuous cycle.
   - This needs to be supported by quickly improving the regulatory
   setting.  The Make-in-India campaign recognizes this, promising a growing
   economy alongside a more welcoming investment climate.  (On the OECD’s
   “regulatory restrictiveness” index, India is already assessed as being
   somewhat less restrictive than China toward FDI—although it remains
   considerably more restrictive than the OECD average.[7]
   <#401302484__edn8>)
   - India’s investment-promotion infrastructure needs to be strengthened.


As to investment promotion, three signal actions ought to be taken by India
immediately:


   1. Establish a powerful, unified central IPA, reporting directly to the
   Prime Minister.  Functions should include systematically attracting FDI
   (and especially FDI exhibiting sustainability characteristics), targeting
   investors in sectors important to India’s development, providing aftercare
   services, boosting investor trust and perception, and undertaking policy
   advocacy.  Since, in the end, all investment is local, strong IPAs are also
   desirable at the state level.  Proper coordination between the central and
   state IPAs—admittedly, a challenge—is essential to ensure follow-up and
   avoid incentive wars among states.  As in China, these measures would
   establish the institutional infrastructure for attracting FDI and
   benefitting from it.  Regular reports to the Prime Minister should detail
   progress made.
   2. Create an independent Investment Ombudsperson Office, headed by a
   person well respected in the private and public sectors. The Office would
   mediate where issues arise between governmental authorities and foreign
   investors, including to prevent conflicts escalating into costly
   international investor-state arbitrations.  This becomes all the more
   important as, inevitably, rising FDI inflows increase the potential for
   conflicts.  The Prime Minister should be informed through a fast-track
   procedure about problems that require immediate attention at the highest
   levels.  Establishing such an Office (which worked well in the Republic of
   Korea) would go beyond China’s investment-promotion efforts, sending a
   powerful signal to the world’s investment community.
   3. Launch an independent annual *Indian Investment Report*.  Such a
   report should monitor issues regarding FDI in India (placing them also in
   an international context), assess the impact of FDI on the local economy,
   examine matters of special interest to India (e.g., technology transfer,
   tax issues, linkages with global value chains), and recommend ways to
   increase FDI inflows and their contribution toward sustainable development.


There is no reason why India should not be able to attract as much FDI, and
benefit from it to the same extent, as China.  It is up to the government
of India to accelerate action.

------------------------------

* <#401302484__ednref1> Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask]) is Resident
Senior Fellow, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), Columbia
University; Daniel Allman ([log in to unmask]) is an LL.M.
candidate at Columbia Law School and a legal intern at CCSI.  The authors
are grateful to Ravi Kant, Premila Nazareth Satyanand and Harsha Singh for
their helpful peer reviews. *The views expressed by the author of this *
*Perspective** do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Columbia
University or its partners and supporters. **Columbia FDI Perspectives**
(ISSN 2158-3579) is a peer-reviewed series.*

[1] <#401302484__ednref2> Government of India, *“Make in India” website*
http://makeinindia.com/about
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=9a23805880&e=6f8fc3f180>
.

2 *UNCTAD STAT database* http://unctadstat.unctad.org
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=4eb98a0061&e=6f8fc3f180>
.

[3] <#401302484__ednref4> *Ibid*.

[4] <#401302484__ednref5> *Ibid*.

[5] <#401302484__ednref6> *See*, The World Bank, *World Development
Indicators *
http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=1100ab71cf&e=6f8fc3f180>;
World Economic Forum, *The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016*
(Geneva: WEF, 2015); and Milken Institute, *Global Opportunity Index*
(Santa Monica: Milken Institute, 2015).

[6] <#401302484__ednref7> A.T. Kearney, *FDI Confidence Index website *
http://atkearney.com/ideas-insights
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=7e3d2e1c42&e=6f8fc3f180>
.

[7] <#401302484__ednref8> *See*, http://oecd.org/investment/fdiindex.htm
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=0ab4c3a760&e=6f8fc3f180>
.



 *The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the
following acknowledgment: “Karl Sauvant and Daniel Allman, ‘Can India
emulate China in attracting and benefitting from FDI?,’* *Columbia FDI
Perspectives, No. 168, February 29, 2016. Reprinted with permission from
the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (www.ccsi.columbia.edu
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=836dfaba9f&e=6f8fc3f180>).”
A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable
Investment at [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>.*



For further information, including information regarding submission to the
*Perspectives*, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment,
Maree Newson, [log in to unmask]


*Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=9f90eb40f9&e=6f8fc3f180>


   - No. 167, Nahom Ghehibriwet, “Mining automation: threat or opportunity
   for FDI technology spillovers?” February 15, 2016.
   - No. 166, Eric Neumayer and Peter Nunnenkamp, “Democracies conclude
   more and stricter international investment agreements – but why?” February
   1, 2016.
   - No. 165, Henry Loewendahl, “A new foreign direct investment accounting
   methodology for economic development organizations,” January 18, 2016.

*All previous **FDI Perspectives** are available at *
*http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives/*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=242556be1c&e=6f8fc3f180>
*. *

   -


Karl P. Sauvant, Ph.D.
Resident Senior Fellow
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute
Ph: (212) 854-0689
Fax: (212) 854-7946

*Copyright © 2016 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All
rights reserved.*
[log in to unmask]



[image: Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp]
<http://www.mailchimp.com/monkey-rewards/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=monkey_rewards&aid=ab15cc1d53&afl=1>

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.