Print

Print


*Karl P. Sauvant, PhD*
*Resident Senior Fellow*
*Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment*
Columbia Law School - The Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 825, New York, NY 10027
| p: (212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask]
| w: www.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia
<https://twitter.com/CCSI_Columbia>


The Evolving International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Ways
Forward (E15 Task Force policy options), "China's outward FDI and
international investment law", "Policy options for promoting FDI in
the LDCs", “The negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on
Transnational Corporations: Experience and lessons learned”, and
*Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options
for the Future are* available at
http://www.works.bepress.com/karl_sauvant/.




View this email in your browser
<http://us6.campaign-archive2.com/?u=ab15cc1d53&id=8bf252b530&e=dd153d6a25>

哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看:
http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives.
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=388bab9dcd&e=dd153d6a25>
*Columbia FDI Perspectives*
Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues
No. 169  March 14, 2016
Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask])
Managing Editor: Maree Newson ([log in to unmask])
*Land investments and human rights: how home countries can do more*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=0b2f19a78c&e=dd153d6a25>
by
Kaitlin Y. Cordes and Anna Bulman*** <#6115191946447473859__edn1>

The past decade has witnessed heightened corporate interest in large-scale
land-based agricultural and forestry investment by foreign investors. This
commonly involves the transfer of use rights for large tracts of land from
governments to investors. These investments can have positive effects for
local communities, such as providing employment. They also, however, can
have devastating impacts on human rights, including through forced
displacement and loss of livelihoods necessary to secure rights to food and
housing.

Host countries, through their actions or inactions, play a primary role in
rights violations. Government actors may forcibly evict land users to make
way for concessions, provide abusive security forces to protect
concessions, divert important water supplies, or otherwise enable investors
to undertake projects that negatively affect human rights. At other times,
host countries are simply unable to protect human rights in the face of
such investments, having insufficient resources to monitor and enforce laws
or investment agreements.

International law is currently an imperfect tool for addressing such rights
abuses. Two separate areas of law address concerns. Investors seek redress
under international investment law, while individuals harmed by investments
rely on mechanisms provided under international human rights law. Under
these systems, the protections afforded to affected local persons are
greatly inferior to the protections granted to investors.[1]
<#6115191946447473859__edn2> Moreover, the relatively stronger enforcement
mechanisms of international investment law may persuade a host government
to prioritize its obligations under investment law over its obligations
under human rights law. Developments in international human rights and
investment law may eventually address these imbalances, e.g., new avenues
for redress of rights violations, or improved investment treaties that
better address rights impacts. Yet, a more equitable system remains a long
way off.

The current failure of host governments and international law to protect
human rights in the context of land investments highlights the need to
employ other mechanisms, such as home country measures.[2]
<#6115191946447473859__edn3> Setting aside questions of whether home
countries have legal obligations to address human rights impacts abroad,[3]
<#6115191946447473859__edn4> home countries have good reasons to encourage
more rights-supportive outward investment – such as upholding commitments
under the Sustainable Development Goals – and have shown willingness to
enact laws with extraterritorial reach.[4] <#6115191946447473859__edn5>

To start, home countries can ensure that domestic policies, such as those
promoting biofuels, do not inadvertently promote land deals with negative
rights impacts. Governments have several options for addressing problematic
policies: rescinding if the risks are too high, modifying to alleviate
risks or introducing safeguards. In particular, safeguards might include
requiring outward investors to undertake human rights impact assessments
and denying related benefits when negative impacts are revealed.

Home countries that support outward investors engaging in land deals can
condition their financial or diplomatic support on compliance with human
rights-related standards or processes. For example, under Canada’s outward
investor corporate social responsibility policy,[5]
<#6115191946447473859__edn6> extractive companies choosing not to
participate in disputes referred to Canada’s National Contact Point for the
OECD Guidelines face withdrawal of government advocacy support and
potential implications for financial support.

Finally, home countries can establish disclosure requirements for outward
investment. Such requirements encourage investors to mitigate reputational
risks by advancing more responsible operations and can be coupled with due
diligence obligations. Examples from the extractive industry are the United
States Dodd-Frank Act[6] <#6115191946447473859__edn7> and the European
Union Accounting Directive,[7] <#6115191946447473859__edn8> which impose
disclosure, assessment and reporting obligations. To encourage more
responsible land investments, similar requirements could be created for
companies investing in foreign agricultural and forestry projects.

These measures provide avenues through which home countries can seek to
influence outward investment in this area. Particularly when combined with
redress mechanisms, such as entertaining tort claims against domiciled
entities for abuses committed overseas, home countries can encourage more
rights-consistent investments that benefit all stakeholders: home
countries’ outward investors, host countries receiving the investment and
the local communities affected by such investment.

------------------------------
* <#6115191946447473859__ednref1> Kaitlin Y. Cordes (
[log in to unmask]) is the head of the Land and Agriculture
team at the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI); An­na Bulman (
[log in to unmask]) is an Australian lawyer and former legal intern at
CCSI, now working as a David W. Leebron Human Rights Fellow at the Legal
Resources Centre in South Africa. This* Perspective* is based on Kaitlin Y.
Cordes and Anna Bulman, “Corporate agricultural investment and the right to
food: addressing disparate protections and promoting rights-consistent
outcomes,” *UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs*
(forthcoming). The authors are grateful to Gabriel Bottini, Lorenzo Cotula
and Amnon Lehavi for their helpful feedback. *The views expressed by the
authors of this Perspective do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia University or its partners and supporters. Columbia FDI
Perspectives (ISSN 2158-3579) is a peer-reviewed series.*
[1] <#6115191946447473859__ednref2> *See,* Lorenzo Cotula, “Law at two
speeds: legal frameworks regulating foreign investment in the global
South”, *Columbia FDI Perspectives*, No. 73, June 29, 2012.
[2] <#6115191946447473859__ednref3> Although some soft law instruments
discuss the role of home countries (*see, e.g.,* Committee on World Food
Security, *Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food
Systems*, CFS 2014/41/4 Rev. 1, paras 32-33), the importance of home
country measures is not uniformly endorsed. For example, the recent New
Alliance “Analytical Framework for Responsible Land-Based Agricultural
Investments” notes the importance of host country action but fails to
mention home countries (available at
http://new-alliance.org/resource/analytical-framework-responsible-land-based-agricultural-investments
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=e4e9d8db04&e=dd153d6a25>
).
[3] <#6115191946447473859__ednref4> Many legal scholars assert that
governments have human rights obligations beyond their own borders. *See,
e.g.*, The Maastricht Centre of Human Rights and the International
Commission of Jurists, *Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial
Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights *(September
28, 2011), available at
http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/web/Institutes/MaastrichtCentreForHumanRights/MaastrichtETOPrinciples.htm
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=3e00886f7f&e=dd153d6a25>
.
[4] <#6115191946447473859__ednref5> *See* Columbia Center on Sustainable
Investment, *Home Country Measures (HCM) Taxonomy* (November 7, 2014)
available at
http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/CCSI-Taxonomy-_-Nov-10.pdf
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=ddee43a021&e=dd153d6a25>
[5] <#6115191946447473859__ednref6>  Canadian Ministry of International
Trade, *Doing Business the Canadian Way: A Strategy to Advance Corporate
Social Responsibility in Canada’s Extractive Sector Abroad*, (November 14,
2014), available at
http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/other-autre/csr-strat-rse.aspx?lang=eng
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=ab259fafbf&e=dd153d6a25>
.
[6] <#6115191946447473859__ednref7> US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010, sections 1504, 1502.
[7] <#6115191946447473859__ednref8> Directive 2013/34/EU of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013.

 *The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the
following acknowledgment: “Kaitlin Y. Cordes and Anna Bulman, ‘Land
investments and human rights: how home countries can do more,’ **Columbia
FDI Perspectives, No. 169, March 14, 2016. Reprinted with permission from
the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (www.ccsi.columbia.edu
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=121c53c435&e=dd153d6a25>).”
A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable
Investment at [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>. *
For further information, including information regarding submission to the
*Perspectives*, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment,
Maree Newson, [log in to unmask]

*Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=8733c9c33c&e=dd153d6a25>


   - No. 168, Karl Sauvant and Daniel Allman, “Can India emulate China in
   attracting and benefitting from FDI?” February 29, 2016.
   - No. 167, Nahom Ghebrihiwet, “Mining automation: threat or opportunity
   for FDI technology spillovers?” February 15, 2016.
   - No. 166, Eric Neumayer and Peter Nunnenkamp, “Democracies conclude
   more and stricter international investment agreements – but why?” February
   1, 2016.

*All previous FDI Perspectives are available at *
*http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives/*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=3143e50774&e=dd153d6a25>
*. *

*Other relevant CCSI news and announcements*

   - *On* *July 6-15**,* 2016, CCSI will hold its Executive Training
   on Sustainable Investments in Agriculture
   <http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=e16eeb150a&e=dd153d6a25>
at
   Columbia University in New York City. The program provides an
   interdisciplinary approach to addressing the challenges and opportunities
   of agricultural investments. The program is designed primarily for public
   sector officials and civil society representatives from low-and
   middle-income countries,​ to equip participants with the necessary
   knowledge and skills to address some of the key challenges posed by
   international investments in agriculture and to encourage a rich dialogue
   about best practices from around the globe.* For more information on
   the program, including application materials, please visit our website
   <http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=ebdf868ed1&e=dd153d6a25>.*
   Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis until March 25, 2016.
   - *In March, 2016*, CCSI released several new publications related to
   land-based investments:

* - Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human Rights, and Investor Protections
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=73ac150ff7&e=dd153d6a25>*
This new report provides practical solutions for governments confronting
community grievances arising from land-based investments, particularly in
the context of complex and competing legal obligations. Accompanying this
report
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=5e8098a7fa&e=dd153d6a25>
is
a related briefing note, *Land
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=18681bbf79&e=dd153d6a25>deals
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=6bf58062d4&e=dd153d6a25>*
 *and the law*
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=3ae15a2f00&e=dd153d6a25>
,
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=99309da511&e=dd153d6a25>
as
well as a training module
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=bf701c005a&e=dd153d6a25>with
a presentation, accompanying notes, and related exercise. These and other
materials are available for download here
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=2da070fd6c&e=dd153d6a25>
.

* - Transparency in Land-Based Investment: Key Questions and Next Steps
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=b3abfc0ac0&e=dd153d6a25>*
This briefing note, co-authored with the Open Contracting Partnership
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=ab15cc1d53&id=20a48d1a8a&e=dd153d6a25>,
examines the importance of contract disclosure and an inclusive contracting
process. It also considers what such transparency entails, and how various
stakeholders can work towards achieving it.
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute
Columbia University
*Copyright © 2016 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All
rights reserved.*
[log in to unmask]

*Our mailing address is:*
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027

Add us to your address book
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/vcard?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a437e0fd88>


unsubscribe from this list
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a437e0fd88&e=dd153d6a25&c=8bf252b530>
update subscription preferences
<http://columbia.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=ab15cc1d53&id=a437e0fd88&e=dd153d6a25>


[image: Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp]
<http://www.mailchimp.com/monkey-rewards/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=monkey_rewards&aid=ab15cc1d53&afl=1>

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.