 |
 |
Interesting and depressing. --STeve On 07/09/15 16:47, Gary Schrock wrote: > I just actually had two machines I just finished looking at that were > also having dhcp issues just now. Both a Dell and a printer had > failed to get dhcp addresses and had defaulted to their built in > auto-ip addresses. (Both of these were machines that would have > gotten 35.15 addresses because they weren't currently registered.) I > just kinda wrote it off as a fluke, but maybe there's something more > widespread going on? Yesterday I had a machine that I registered, got > it's 35.10 ip address, then shortly after I got a call saying that it > wasn't working again, and sure enough, it had a 35.15 address once > more, but when I went into the registration stuff, it was recognized > as having been registered (that machine I had to unregister and > reregister to get working again). > > Gary > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Stephen Andre <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > So, here's a new one for me. > > A user reports that she isn't on the net when she boots up > in the morning. After five minutes or so, she is. > > I'm on this system now. I had a 169 address, meaning dhcp > failed. Doing a manual ipconfig release/renew fixes it. > > Any clues as to why this would fail this way? > > Thanks all.. > > > --STeve Andre' > >