Print

Print




Karl P. Sauvant, PhD
Resident Senior Fellow

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment*
Columbia Law School - The Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th St., Rm. JGH 645, New York, NY 10027
p(212) 854 0689 | cell: (646) 724 5600 e: [log in to unmask]
wwww.ccsi.columbia.edu | t: @CCSI_Columbia

* Formerly the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable international Investment.

“The negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations: Experience and lessons learned” and K. P. Sauvant and F. Ortino, Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options for the Future are available at http://www.works.bepress.com/karl_sauvant/.



View this email in your browser

哥伦比亚大学国际直接投资展望中文版都可以在我们的网站查看:http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives.

Columbia FDI Perspectives

Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues
No. 150   June 22, 2015

Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([log in to unmask])
Managing Editor: Adrian P. Torres ([log in to unmask])
 
The annexation of Crimea by Russia in March 2014 and Russian support of separatist groups in Eastern Ukraine provoked sanctions from the United States (US) and European Union (EU) on Russian banks, as well as restrictions on the export of military and dual-use goods. Negotiations about trade and investment issues in various fora halted. Russia responded with import restrictions, especially on food, and Russian politicians threatened to nationalize foreign assets, including foreign direct investment (FDI) projects.[1] The investment climate suffered as a result of increased political risk, reflected in a 50% decrease of inward FDI (IFDI) in the first half of 2014 ($24 billion), as compared to the first half of 2013.[2]
 
Although the majority of the business communities in the US and the EU supported their governments’ policy, they nevertheless hope that the economic ties they have built in the past two decades will not be destroyed. Several business representatives and economists also raised doubts about whether economic sanctions will have positive political effects, fearing that many companies could lose market shares to Asian competitors. Russia has already re-oriented its oil and gas policy to China.
 
Since the opening of Russia’s economy in the early 1990s, trade and investment ties with Western economies have grown considerably. Russia is the EU’s third largest trade partner, and the EU strongly depends on Russian energy, whereas Russia depends on Western imports of investment goods for the modernization of its economy. Russia’s IFDI stock rose from virtually nothing in 1990 to US$576 billion by the end of 2013.[3] But a large part of Russian IFDI is round-tripping capital that is channeled through Cyprus, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Caribbean tax havens. Therefore, the real size of Russia’s IFDI lags much behind IFDI into other post-Soviet economies like Poland and other emerging markets.
 
The low investments of Western multinational enterprises in Russia are due to its weak and uneven economic growth in the past two decades as Russia failed to diversify its resource-driven economy. Additionally, corruption, bureaucratic barriers and weak infrastructure have hampered FDI inflows. Economic growth was already sluggish before the start of the conflict in 2014; with sanctions, the Russian economy is expected to contract by 3% in 2015.[4]
 
Despite many problems, Russia has been a reliable business partner for foreign investors in the past decade. To modernize its economy, Russia has created a solid FDI regime. The 1999 Federal Law No. 160 on foreign investment (the most important law), together with the 1991 Investment Code, guarantee that foreign investors have rights equal to Russian investors. The Russian constitution allows for nationalization only under very limited conditions. In addition, 54 bilateral investment treaties are in force. Russia is also a member of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and Western firms do not depend on Russian courts before turning to ICSID. On the other hand, limits on foreign ownership in sectors that have strategic significance for national defense and state security, Russia’s withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty, as well as the sluggish privatization process, prevented higher FDI from Western firms in the past.
 
From a long-term perspective, Russia’s abundant natural resources and human capital should make it an interesting market for foreign investors. But its political problems and the uncertainty over harsher sanctions—causing perhaps a sanction spiral—are destroying trust, an essential requirement for FDI projects. Meanwhile, Russia has sent mixed signals. It still wants to attract Western FDI and has continued to relax investment barriers; but it has also threatened to impose new retaliatory measures or to shift toward Asia to replace Western investment.
 
Russian policy makers are also divided. In October 2014, a new draft law (the so-called “Rotenberg bill”) that would allow the confiscation of assets of foreign enterprises to compensate Russian citizens and companies for Western sanctions, passed a first reading in parliament’s lower house with a slim majority. In November 2014, it was blocked by Russia’s Supreme Court. Although the Russian Economy Minister had repeatedly warned that the law is counterproductive,[5] foreign investors are missing a clear signal from the Russian government that their investments are welcomed and safe.
 
In late 2014, the economic environment worsened, and a currency crisis led to an acceleration of the ruble’s depreciation. FDI prospects further deteriorated. Although some companies (especially in the food industry) could increase FDI in Russia to circumvent trade barriers, the weakening economy and shrinking exports to Russia will dampen market and export oriented FDI for the majority of investors. In a recent survey of 300 German companies operating in Russia, 12% of the firms answered that they are planning to divest in Russia if the situation does not improve.[6]
 
* Thomas Jost ([log in to unmask]) is Economics Professor at the University of Applied Sciences Aschaffenburg. The author is grateful to Kari Liuhto, Andrei Panibratov and Zbigniew Zimny for their helpful peer reviews. The views expressed by the author of this Perspective do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Columbia University or its partners and supporters. Columbia FDI Perspectives (ISSN 2158-3579) is a peer-reviewed series.
[1] See “Russia preparing Response to U.S. and EU sanctions“, The Moscow Times, March 6, 2014www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russia-preparing-response-to-us-and-eu-sanctions/495665.html.
[2] See Central Bank of Russia, www.cbr.ru/eng/statistics/?Prtid=svs.
[3] See UNCTAD’s FDI database, http://unctadstat.unctad.org
[4] See The World Bank, Global Economic Prospects, January 2015, www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects.
[5] See Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, “Rußland wirbt um westliche Investoren”, www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/interview-mit-russlands-wirtschaftsminister-uljukajew-13284410.html.
[6] See “Wenn der Rubel nicht mehr rollt“, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, December 17, 2014, www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/russlands-rubel-krise-wirkt-sich-auf-deutsche-unternehmen-aus-13327662.html.
The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the following acknowledgment: “Thomas Jost, ‘FDI in Russia in Difficult Times,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives, No. 150, June 22, 2015. Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (www.ccsi.columbia.edu).” A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment at [log in to unmask].
For further information, including information regarding submission to the Perspectives, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Alex Weaver, [log in to unmask]
 
Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives 
  • No. 149, John P. Gaffney, “When is investor-state dispute settlement appropriate to resolve investment disputes? An idea for a rule-of-law ratings mechanism,” June 8, 2015.
  • No. 148, In Hyeock Lee, Shige Makino and Eunsuk Hong, “Outward FDI does not necessarily cost domestic employment of MNEs at home: Evidence from Japanese MNEs,” May 25, 2015.
  • No. 147, Joachim Karl, “An appellate body for international investment disputes: How appealing is it?,” May 11, 2015.
All previous FDI Perspectives are available at http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives/

Other relevant CCSI news and announcements
  • On July 9, 2015, CCSI, the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network will co-sponsor,” A Safe Future for Fossil Fuel Investments in a Carbon-Constrained World?,” a panel discussion including Jeffrey Sachs, Director, Earth Institute at Columbia University, and Ken Cohen, Vice President, Public and Government Affairs, ExxonMobil, among others. The purpose of this panel is to exchange views and ideas from all stakeholders involved in the divestment and engagement discussions, to think critically about their implications, and to explore their potential effectiveness. The aim is to give guidance on a framework for constructive engagement between responsible investors and the fossil fuel industry and allow both investors and the industry to play their part in securing our common future. Registration is free, but required. Please register here. For more information, please visit our website here.
  • On July 13-17, 2015, CCSI will host its first Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials at Columbia University. Through an intensive week-long course, government officials involved in managing investment treaty disputes or negotiating investment treaties will increase their knowledge of crucial procedural and substantive aspects of investment law. Sessions will be taught by leading academics and practitioners and will be tailored to uniquely address issues relevant to governments. For more information about the program, please download the 2015 Executive Training Brochure here and application here.
  • On June 15, 2015, CCSI and the Global Economic Governance Programme at Oxford University launched a new online forum on New Thinking on Investment Treaties, a series of short presentations by academics, practitioners, and civil society on key topics in international investment law. All presentations will be posted at noon EST here. Please subscribe to the channel and visit our website for updatesFor more information and for the schedule of speakers, please visit our website here.
Karl P. Sauvant, Ph.D.
Resident Senior Fellow
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute
Ph: 
(212) 854-0689
Fax: (212) 854-7946
Copyright © 2015 Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), All rights reserved.
[log in to unmask]

Our mailing address is:
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Columbia Law School - Earth Institute, Columbia University
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance: [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.