Print

Print


Apologies for cross postings…





*Journal of International Management Special Issue Call for Papers*



*GLOBALIZATION OF CAPITAL MARKETS:  IMPLICATIONS FOR FIRM STRATEGIES*



*GUEST EDITORS *

Igor Filatotchev, City University London and Vienna University of Economics
and Business

R. Greg Bell, University of Dallas

Abdul A. Rasheed, University of Texas at Arlington



*Submission Deadline: May 15, 2015*



The increasing integration of global capital markets now makes it easier
for firms to access capital outside of their home countries. Firms access
international capital markets through a variety of means such as initial
public offerings (IPO), seasoned equity offerings (SEO), cross-listings,
depository receipts, special purpose acquisition companies (SPACS), shelf
offerings, private equity and other informal equity capital channels.
Firms can also access debt resources outside their market through bank
loans, and foreign bond issues. Finally, cross border flows of venture
capital (VC) continue to increase rapidly. The objective of this Special
Issue will be to explore the challenges firms face in capital markets
beyond their domestic boundaries, be it equity, debt, or VC markets.



While IB research continues to evaluate the challenges facing firms in
foreign product markets, IB scholars have yet to adequately address the
underlying reasons why firms face challenges in foreign equity markets.
These include underpricing, higher underwriting and professional fees,
higher listing fees, audit fees (Bronson, Ghosh, and Hogan, 2009), and
greater risk of lawsuits (Bhattacharya, Galpin, and Haslem, 2007), and home
bias on the part of investors (French and Poterba, 1991). Further, research
suggests the existence of a “foreign firm discount” relative to host market
firms (Frésard and Salva, 2010).



Venture capital and private equity have truly become global phenomena and
take many forms such as cross-border investment, foreign acquisitions, VC
firms opening offices overseas, and influencing their portfolio firms to
enter and exit international stock exchanges. Foreign firms raise
significantly more debt than equity in the U.S..  Indeed, the largest
component of the international capital market is the bond market.



Research on the motivation, the processes, the supporting mechanisms, and
the range of outcomes that firms experience as a result of entering
international capital markets is extremely limited so far. We believe such
research can draw from a variety of theoretical perspectives and research
traditions in international business.  The choice of whether to access
financial resources outside of the firm’s home market, how to select the
appropriate foreign market, and the manner in which to raise resources are
all relevant questions that parallel prior IB research market and entry
mode choice.  IB scholars consider LOF as the “fundamental assumption
driving theories of the multinational enterprise” (Zaheer, 1995: 341). Yet,
the conceptualization and research on LOF solely based upon product market
may be inadequate today given the increasing integration of capital markets
(Bell, Filatotchev and Rasheed, 2012).



In addition to the main theoretical perspectives in international business,
the Special Issue welcomes scholars and perspectives from diverse
disciplines such as finance, economics, and sociology.



*TOPICS*

*The interaction between product market and capital market strategies*

   - Prior research shows that the decision to list abroad has implications
   on the success of the firm’s products. What are the implications of capital
   market strategies for product market strategies and vice versa?



*Culture and capital markets*

   - There is a growing body of research that investigates how culture
   affects both economic exchange and outcomes by affecting expectations and
   preferences (Guiso, Sapienza, and Zingales, 2009). How does culture affect
   cross-border transactions in formal or informal capital markets?



*The role of distance*

   - Even in a world where technology has shrunk distance and time, spatial
   costs are non-trivial. Do spatial costs exist in financial markets?
   Moreover, do spatial costs impact capital market strategies, and the choice
   of foreign capital markets?



*The role of innovation*

   - Financial markets are continuously producing new vehicles through
   which firms can acquire capital resources. What are the antecedents of
   innovations in global capital markets? How do firms take advantage of these
   innovations?



*Institutional environments and their implications on capital market
strategies*

   - New exchanges in Europe and Asia with vastly different listing and
   disclosure requirements thank New York and London. How has the competition
   among stock exchanges impacted the international capital raising strategies
   of firms?



*Liabilities of Foreignness*

   - What are the sources of Liabilities of Foreignness (LOF) that firms
   face in formal or informal capital markets and what are the strategies that
   enable firms to overcome them?



*Informal capital market strategies*

   - Private equity represents an innovation in the ability to provide
   capital to unquoted firms.  What are challenges that private equity firms
   face in international markets? Likewise, what are the challenges that
   private equity portfolio firms face?

*Governance and capital market strategies*

   - To what extent does internationalization of capital markets lead to
   convergence of governance practices across countries??



*The role of trust*

   - Trust has been found to affect the international investment choices of
   private equity firms (Bruton, Ahlstrom, and Puky, 2009). How does trust
   impact the international capital market strategies of firms?



*Third parties and capital market strategies*

   - Capital markets are mediated markets in that sense that participants
   rely greatly on key third parties, such as investment banks, brokers, and
   investment analysts for information production.  How do third parties
   impact the choice of foreign capital markets?   What are the
   internationalization strategies that these third parties pursue?



*Processes*

   - What are the top management and board factors that impact capital
   market strategies? Both individual and team level factors hold considerable
   promise providing greater insights into the reasons why firms choose
   capital resources outside of their home market, and the manner in which
   these resources are accessed.



*Performance*

   - What accounts for success in foreign capital markets? How do
   strategies for firms seeking debt capital differ from those seeking equity?
   How do home and host country factors determine the outcome of these
   strategies?



   - While many of the firms that make their initial public offerings go on
   to succeed, what is often overlooked is the fact that more than half of
   these firms actually delist within the first few years (Doidge, Karolyi,
   and Stulz, 2010). What are the factors that account for the delisting of
   firms on foreign exchanges?





*SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS*

The deadline for manuscript submission is May 15, 2015. Manuscripts should
be prepared in accordance with Journal of International Management’s Style
Guide for Authors:
http://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-international-management/1075-4253/guide-for-authors
and submitted through the Journal’s submission website. A paper development
workshop will be held at the 2015 Academy of Management conference in
Vancouver. Final Drafts are due February 28, 2016.

Please direct any questions regarding the Special Issue to Igor Filatotchev
([log in to unmask]), Greg Bell ([log in to unmask]) and Abdul
Rasheed ([log in to unmask]).



*REFERENCES*

Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., Rasheed, A. 2012. The liability of
foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. *Journal of
International Business Studies,* 43(2): 107-122.

Bhattacharya, U., Galpin, N., Haslem, B. 2007.  The home court advantage in
international corporate litigation. *Journal of Law and Economics,* 50:
625-659.

Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., Puky, T. 2009. Institutional differences and the
development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture
capital industries in Latin America and Asia.  *Journal of International
Business Studies,* 40: 762-778.

Doidge, C., Karolyi, A., Stulz, R., 2010. Why do foreign firms leave U.S.
equity markets? Journal of Finance 65, 1507-1553.

French, K., Poterba, J. 1991. Investor diversification and international
equity markets.  *The American Economic Review*, 81(2): 222-226

Frésard, L., Salva, C. 2010. The foreign firm discount. Working Paper, HEC
School of Management, HEC Paris.

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. 2009.  Cultural biases in economic
exchange?  *Quarterly Journal of Economics,* 124(3): 1095–1131.

Schmeisser, B. 2013. A systematic review of literature on offshoring of
value chain activities. *Journal of International Management*, 19(4),
390-406.

Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness*. Academy of
Management Journal*, 38(2): 341-363.





Best,



Greg





Dr. R. Greg Bell
Associate Professor
University of Dallas College of Business
Accredited by AACSB International
1845 E. Northgate Drive | Irving, Texas 75062 | USA
[log in to unmask] | 972-721-5167 |

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.