 |
 |
[image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 2] *Call for papers* Workshop What do we know and what should we know about international knowledge sourcing? *12-13 June 2015* Department of Political and Social Science University of Catania (ITALY) *Full paper submission extended deadline MARCH 15, 2015* International knowledge sourcing has for a long period of time been a hot topic in the innovation studies literature. Scholars in this tradition initially debated on the magnitude of this phenomenon (Cantwell 1995 <#_ENREF_5>; Patel & Pavitt 1991 <#_ENREF_16>), while converging on the idea that international knowledge sourcing is a “North-North” phenomenon with R&D FDI departing from advanced countries and targeting other advanced countries (see e.g., Arvanitis & Hollenstein 2011 <#_ENREF_2>; Cantwell & Piscitello 2000 <#_ENREF_7>). As a result, the hierarchy of foreign R&D locations concerns mainly advanced country locations (Cantwell & Janne 1999 <#_ENREF_6>; Patel & Vega 1999 <#_ENREF_17>), which are ranked on the ground of technology- and R&D activity-specific advantages (Dunning & Narula 1995 <#_ENREF_11>; Florida 1997 <#_ENREF_13>; Pearce & Papanastassiou 1999 <#_ENREF_18>). Innovation studies research has also suggested that R&D internationalization increasingly aims at sourcing knowledge abroad in order to complement and enhance knowledge production at home (Almeida 1996 <#_ENREF_1>; Cantwell & Santangelo 2000 <#_ENREF_8>). However, the most recent statistics and an increasing number of studies paint a “North-South” as well as a “South-North” picture of the phenomenon challenging the stylized facts that research on international knowledge sourcing has traditionally documented. Emerging economies are nowadays major host locations of R&D offshoring. R&D FDI departs from advanced countries and target primarily emerging economies, which are now top-ranked in the hierarchy of foreign R&D locations (Contractor et al. 2010 <#_ENREF_9>; D'Agostino et al. 2013 <#_ENREF_10>; UNCTAD 2005 <#_ENREF_19>). A parallel increasing pattern is the offshoring of R&D by firms originating in emerging economies and targeting advanced countries (UNCTAD 2005 <#_ENREF_19>; Von Zedtwitz 2006 <#_ENREF_20>). Thus, the emergence of new locations and players has transformed knowledge sourcing from a cross-border to a truly global phenomenon. These recent developments raise questions related to the effective possibility of “traditional” actors to source knowledge at “non-traditional” locations as well as the effective capability of “non-traditional” actors to source knowledge in “traditional” locations. Although emerging economies are experiencing an upgrading of technological capabilities and enjoy a large availability of talents (Athreye & Cantwell 2007 <#_ENREF_3>; Lewin et al. 2009 <#_ENREF_14>), yet, the ability of these new locations to develop state-of-the-art knowledge remains open to debate (von Zedtwitz & Gassmann 2002 <#_ENREF_21>). Specifically, a critical issue concerns the type of knowledge and R&D activities that are more likely to be sourced and located in emerging economies, and the new international division of labor in knowledge production that has emerged as a consequence (Fifarek & Veloso 2010 <#_ENREF_12>). The fact that recent statistics on R&D internationalization have documented document a growing involvement of emerging economies as host locations of R&D FDI has raised great interest (Moncada-Paternò-Castello et al. 2011 <#_ENREF_15>), but the phenomenon is not fully understood at this point in time. Likewise, there is some evidence that firms located in fast-growing emerging economies perform FDI in developed economies with a technology-seeking intent (Athreye & Kapur 2009 <#_ENREF_4>). Also this phenomenon is not fully understood from theoretical and empirical points of view. The focus is on emerging economies as host locations of R&D offshoring departing from advanced locations as well as home locations of R&D offshoring targeting advanced countries. Theoretical and empirical arguments motivate this choice. Whether international knowledge sourcing follows a “North-South” (“Northern” firms investing in the “South”) or a “South-North” (“Southern” firms investing in the “North”) pattern, these perspectives represent two sides of the same coin and both challenge our current knowledge of the phenomenon. Both theoretical and empirical contributions, which draw on different theoretical streams, adopt diverse empirical approaches, and apply a single or multi-level analysis, are welcomed. Possible topics and research questions would include, but would not be limited to, the following list: · The most recent statistics document that emerging economies are now top-ranked in the hierarchy of foreign R&D locations. But can firms from developed countries effectively source knowledge in “non-traditional” locations? What is the effect of R&D investments in these locations on the investors’ performance? · Recent research points out to a new international division of labor in knowledge production challenging the “North-North” pattern traditionally characterizing the knowledge sourcing phenomenon. What type of knowledge and R&D activities should be strategically outsourced and what type kept at home? What are the interaction mechanisms between offshored and home-base R&D activities? How do such mechanisms affect performance? · Emerging economies have experienced an upgrading of technological capabilities and enjoy a large availability of talents, but are actors in these locations able to develop state-of-the-art technology? · Recent statistics on R&D internationalization document a growing involvement of emerging economies as home locations of R&D FDI. What type of knowledge are emerging markets firms able to effectively source in developed countries—and for what purposes? *Keynote Speaker* *Maryann Feldman* (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA) This is a launching workshop of an Industrial and Corporate Change Special Issue Session. The workshop will provide an opportunity for intensive discussion and dialogue on the topic. Papers presented at the workshop may be considered for publication in the Special Issue Section of Industrial and Corporate Change. Acceptance to the workshop does not grant acceptance to the Special Issue Section. Perspective participants are requested to submit a full paper to [log in to unmask] by *MARCH 15, 2015* (extended deadline) and will be notified by *April 10, 2015*. The workshop will host about 20 papers. Participation to the workshop is limited to presenting authors, who may be asked to act as discussants. There may be limited space for scholars interested in attending as general participants. There is no participation fee, but participants are requested to cover their own travel and accommodation. *Schedule* *15 March 2015*: Extended submission deadline *10 April 2015: *Notification to authors *25 April 2015:* Required registration *12 May 2015*: Workshop program online *12-13 June 2015:* Workshop in Catania *Organizing and Scientific Committee * Keld Laursen, Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics, Copenhagen Business School Grazia D. Santangelo, Department of Political and Social Science, University of Catania, Italy Lorena D’Agostino, Department of Political and Social Science, University of Catania, Italy Daniela Maggioni, Department of Political and Social Science, University of Catania, Italy Further info are available at http://www.dsps.unict.it/IB4EU/ICCWorkshop Professor Grazia Santangelo Jean Monnet Chair International Business for European Union (IB4EU) Department of Political and Social Science University of Catania Via Vittorio Emanuele II, 8 95131 Catania ITALY http://www.dsps.unict.it/content/scheda-docente?cf=U05UR1pENzNBNDlHMzcxSA== <http://www.dsps.unict.it/IB4EU/en> ____ AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business. For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp To post message: [log in to unmask] For assistance: [log in to unmask] AIB-L is a moderated list.