Print

Print


Wow, you all make this sound like the Y2K crisis, and we all know how 
that turned out :).

-- dkm


At 3/21/2014 11:33 AM Friday, David Graff wrote:
>If you're continuing to run XP systems, it would be a good idea to disable
>autoplay on them. Users with local admin rights plus a mis-click on an
>autorun popup can hose the system really quickly. Microsoft has a FixIt
>utilitie to do the job, along with registry and group policy methods:
>
>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967715
>
>Autoplay is a dangerous feature and we disabled it across the board, not
>just on XP systems.
>
>On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:23:36 +0000, Bosman, Don <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
> >Sneaker net and thumb drives will be your attack vectors.
> >If a researcher finds it expedient to have data moved faster than you can
>accommodate them, they are likely to improvise.
> >Keep the anti-virus and anti-malware up to date.
> >
> >You've probably seen the same tales that I have, about security researchers
>leaving spyware infected thumb drives in the parking lots for security
>conscious workers to find. And how every one of the drives was plugged in to
>see what was on it.
> >
> >
> >Don Bosman
> >Information Technologist
> >MSU Libraries
> >366 W. Circle Drive  -  Rm.W441
> >East Lansing, MI 48824-1048
> >517-884-0873
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: David McFarlane [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:16 PM
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Desktop Replacement Policy and XP Mitigation
> >
> >Probably irrelevant to most here, but...
> >
> >We have several Windows XP systems used in research labs for running
>ongoing experiments, using software that until recently did not work well
>under Vista/7, and in any case changing computer configuration in the middle
>of a research study could affect the results, so we continue to run them.
>But we do not use those computers for browsing the internet, and typically
>have the network disabled (even physcially), so I think that makes them
>pretty safe even without updates.  As I understand it, most exploits depend
>on user behavior anyway, so under some circumstances XP systems will be safe
>regardless of updates.  Or am I wrong there?
> >
> >-- dkm