Print

Print


CALL FOR PAPERS
 Journal of World Business special issue: Institutions, entrepreneurship
and co-evolution in international business

   - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.12.001
   -



*Deadline:* *1 October 2013*

 While the strategic importance of institutions to firms’ performance is
well recognised in IB, the nexus between institutions and
agency1<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#fn0005>
(i.e.,
purposeful action by entrepreneurial individuals, groups or organisations)
remains under-developed. The aim of this JWB special issue is to stimulate
work that promotes new theory and empirical, public policy and practitioner
insights on the relationship between institutions (residing at various
levels of analysis) and agency in international business.

Institutions – whether formal or informal, whether internal or external to
the firm – are largely taken-for-granted, culturally-embedded
understandings of appropriate social arrangements and behaviours. Early
perspectives in neo-institutional theory emphasised the power of
institutions to determine patterns of action and organisation, thereby
explaining the convergence of MNEs and managerial practices within the same
institutional environment. That is, firm and individual behaviour was
viewed as being shaped and constrained by pre-existing formal and informal
institutions that reside at the country or international levels of analysis
(e.g., laws, intellectual property rights protection regimes, financial
market institutions, national culture). Deviations from institutional norms
are counteracted by sanctions or seen as imposing significant costs on the
‘offending’ firm or individual.

This early approach remains a strong tradition in IB research examining the
nexus of firms and institutions. Particularly prominent at present are
studies that examine country-level institutional profiles, how
institutional environments determine the most effective strategies and
structures for a diversity of firms, how institutions facilitate or impede
the diffusion of organisational practices throughout MNEs, and the
institutional transformation of transition or emerging economies and its
impact on firms. Concepts such as institutional distance, liability of
foreignness and MNE or international new venture legitimacy hold wide
appeal, but less attention is given to *agency as purposeful action* on the
part of individuals, groups or organisations in maintaining or shaping
existing institutions and creating new ones. Only a narrow range of
institutions are typically considered, and studies of antecedents and
consequences – rather than process, process drivers and co-evolution –
continue to dominate.

Institutions, however, do not only constrain, but also are outcomes of
human agency (i.e., purposive actions). Organisational actors (individuals,
firms, coalitions, etc.,) are not only bound by institutions, but also
enact and reconstruct them. As a corollary, the role that organisations and
individuals play in institutional creation, maintenance and change has come
to the fore in academic debates, primarily outside IB. The recent concept
of ‘institutional entrepreneurship’, whereby institutional entrepreneurs
purposefully mobilise resources to create new institutions or change
existing ones for their own interests, is illustrative of this shift
towards active agency in an institutional
context.2<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#fn0010>
Similarly,
agency is central to co-evolutionary perspectives that connect patterns of
institutional change in wider business systems with more micro processes of
variety generation and experimentation within and across individual
firms.3<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#fn0015>
As
recent research demonstrates, an approach that de-emphasises these
co-evolutionary dynamics and institutional entrepreneurship is perhaps not
even applicable to the case of small firms that internationalize, let alone
large MNEs. The substantial institutional contradictions inherent in the
international business environment bring to the fore the role of agency and
a state of continuous institutional change. This distinctiveness of the
international business context invites longitudinal process-oriented
studies. It also holds potential for stronger theory testing and building
at the intersection of institutions and agency, and eventually the export
of new or refined theories from IB scholarship to adjacent
disciplines.4<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#fn0020>

Through this special issue, we wish to encourage in international business
research this emerging and more nuanced view of the nexus between agency
and institutions residing at various levels of analysis. In doing so, we
join scholars who have considered institutions as constraints, enablers and
outcomes of agency, and have explored the processes of institutional
creation, maintenance and change in the IB context.

The sorts of questions contributors to this special issue might ask
include, but are by no means limited to, the following:
•

How are new structures, practices and identities created, diffused and
institutionalised within MNEs, and how are old ones changed or discarded?
What role might individuals, subsidiaries and headquarters play in such
institutional entrepreneurship? How does competition among institutional
entrepreneurs with different interests unfold within MNEs and what are the
consequences of such competition?
•

Under what conditions are MNEs able to act as institutional entrepreneurs,
mobilising resources to transform existing local or global institutions or
create new ones for their own interests?
•

To what extent may smaller firms and entrepreneurs, often with minimal
market power and facing severe resource constraints, act as agents of
institutional change across borders?
•

Do MNEs have particular advantages in bringing about innovations in
institutions? For example, does multinationality help overcome the ‘paradox
of embedded agency’, i.e., the inherent contradiction in the notion that
agents conditioned by an institution can act to change it?
•

How does institutional duality, i.e., the need for MNE subsidiaries to
conform to both host-country and home-country institutions for legitimacy,
manifest in international business, and how are tensions and opportunities
creatively managed as seemingly incommensurable institutions collide? To
what extent do the challenges of institutional duality affect the
management of smaller firms internationalising?
•

How do institutions at various levels – supranational, regional, national,
industry, within firms – and MNE strategies interact and co-evolve? How do
the (not necessarily coordinated) actions of various actors (e.g., trade
blocs, governments, NGOs, interest groups, MNEs and managers or employees)
influence and, in turn, are influenced by the evolution of these
institutions?
•

How do institutions at the sub-national and national levels interact to
influence MNE decisions and strategies (e.g., location within a
host-country)? Over time, how do these institutions and MNE strategies
co-evolve?
•

How do institutional entrepreneurship and co-evolutionary processes affect
the home and host countries of the MNE? How should the ensuing
transformations be evaluated, and with what consequences for public policy?

 Submission process

Papers that respond to this call should be forwarded to
[log in to unmask] by *1 October 2013*. Authors should follow the
JWB author and style requirements, available at
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/authorinstructions<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=RedirectURL&_method=externObjLink&_locator=url&_issn=10909516&_origin=article&_zone=art_page&_plusSign=%2B&_targetURL=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.elsevier.com%252Fwps%252Ffind%252Fjournaldescription.cws_home%252F620401%252Fauthorinstructions>.
The anticipated publication date is 2015.

All submissions will be expected to develop strong theoretical foundations
and implement rigorous methodologies within their chosen tradition or
perspective, and are subject to JWB review procedures. The special issue
welcomes a broad range of methodologies in enhancing our understanding of
the aforementioned processes. We expect contributions from a diversity of
disciplines that inform international business, including sociology,
political science, anthropology, psychology, economics, socio-linguistics,
and technology studies, among others. We also seek to explore a diversity
of geographic and organisational contexts. Both conceptual and empirical
papers are welcome.
 Special issue editors

Enquiries about the special issue may be made to any of the special issue
co-editors:


Sara L. McGaughey, Griffith University, Australia (
[log in to unmask])

Arun Kumaraswamy, Temple University, United States ([log in to unmask])

Peter W. Liesch, University of Queensland, Australia (
[log in to unmask])




1<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#bfn0005>

Whereas the terms “agent” and “agency” have specific meanings (i.e., a
principal–agent contractual relationship) in agency theory, we use “agent”
to refer to any purposive actor (an individual or an organisation), and
“agency” to refer to the capacity of such an actor to act wilfully (e.g.,
see definition of agency in Oxford English Dictionary).
 2<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#bfn0010>

See, for example, McGaughey, S.L. (2012). Institutional entrepreneurship in
North American lightning protection standards: Rhetorical history and
unintended consequences of failure. Business History, 55(1): 73-97.
 3<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#bfn0015>

See, for example, Cantwell, J., Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2010). An
evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The
co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of
International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.
 4<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951612001253#bfn0020>

See, for example, Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M.T. (2008).
Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique
and new directions. *Academy* of Management Review, 33(4): 994–1006.








-- 

*Sara L. McGaughey, PhD*
 Professor and Higher Degree Research Convenor
Departmental Editor - Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation


Department of International Business and Asian Studies

 Griffith Business School, Griffith University

 Room 1.70 Macrossan Building N16, Nathan Campus

 170 Kessels Road, Nathan

Brisbane, Queensland 4111, AUSTRALIA


Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 4889

 Email: [log in to unmask]
 Web Page of Professor
McGaughey<http://www.griffith.edu.au/business-government/griffith-business-school/departments/department-international-business-asian-studies/staff/professor-sara-mcgaughey>


*Please consider our environment before printing this email*
 Griffith Business School seeks to excel as a provider of high quality,
cross-disciplinary and internationally relevant business and public policy
education and research, emphasising the relationship between business and
society in promoting sustainable enterprises and communities.




-- 

*Sara L. McGaughey, PhD*
 Professor and Higher Degree Research Convenor


Department of International Business and Asian Studies

 Griffith Business School, Griffith University

 Room 1.70 Macrossan Building N16, Nathan Campus

 170 Kessels Road, Nathan

Brisbane, Queensland 4111, AUSTRALIA


Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 4889

 Email: [log in to unmask]
 Web Page of Professor
McGaughey<http://www.griffith.edu.au/business-government/griffith-business-school/departments/department-international-business-asian-studies/staff/professor-sara-mcgaughey>


*Please consider our environment before printing this email*
 Griffith Business School seeks to excel as a provider of high quality,
cross-disciplinary and internationally relevant business and public policy
education and research, emphasising the relationship between business and
society in promoting sustainable enterprises and communities.

____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.