 |
 |
From the article: "As the app is a hybrid between desktop and Metro, typical elements of Metro style apps like the app bar or even swiping backwards and forwards are not supported yet. Swiping up from the edge of the screen or down from the top will activate a fullscreen mode for Chrome Metro — not the typical behaviour found in other Metro style apps." So it isn't a true UI-formerly-known-as-Metro application... and that came out two months ago... and settings/bookmarks are stored separately from desktop version... and their doesn't seem to be any update since that initial release. Add the fact that Google has way more resources (i.e. money and developers) to throw at such a project than almost any other company and it seems to validate my argument more than your's. That one of the most able software companies is having trouble porting their wares to Win8, the same company that was able to easily workaround Apple's roadblocks with their services on iOSin prior years. -Steve Bogdanski >>> On 8/9/2012 at 9:39 AM, "Rytlewski, Jamie" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Maybe Mozilla just doesn’t know how to work with Windows, or they have such junk code (which they keep saying they are fixing the memory leaks). Google had no issue with Metro. http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/12/3079985/google-chrome-metro-style-windows-8-hands-on and Google is about as “non-sanctioned” as you get. From: Steve Bogdanski [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:34 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Windows 8 Reaches RTM Milestone Problems with the grand "unification" strategy from M$: - There will be too different kernels, one for x86 and one for ARM, this will inherently cause fragmentation as some programs are developed for only one platform or their feature sets vary. Office 2013 is a great example since I have heard both that the two versions will be feature-equal and that there will be differences (who to believe). - The new interface (i.e. the UI formally known as Metro) only works well with newly designed applications and M$ hasn't been too helpful with many developers in getting non-sanctioned apps to work (just ask Mozilla). Microsoft still allows for legacy apps, but pretty much deprecates them. The looks/feel of non-UI-formally-known-as-Metro apps is horrible and I am sure many of you out there have to run one or more legacy apps for the foreseeable future (try dealing with medical and research software vendors). - There are two drastically different hardware platforms Win8 covers, touch-based and traditional keyboard/mouse, literally forcing the same UI on both is stupid. Not giving end-users an easy way to revert to the traditional (non-UI-formally-known-as-Metro) desktop and start menu is just pig-headed. There is a reason Apple still runs separate OSes for their desktop/laptop and touch-based systems (and I do not care what people say, Apple knows UI). PS: I am having deja vu regarding a similar thread on the NAG list when Vista came out years ago ;) PPS: I won't bring out the "shiny ball" comparison again -Steve Bogdanski >>> On 8/7/2012 at 10:00 AM, "Wortz, Joshua" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: I think that everyone is missing the big picture. With Windows 8, Microsoft is now unifying all platforms under a single core and interface. Windows 8 empowers users to use the same apps on the desktop, on tablets (ie surface), and even windows phone 8. A unified interface to help end users. A unified kernel, and a unified development environment to empower developers to make their apps available cross platform. So that no matter what device you use, your applications and data can move with you. That is where they are headed with this, and I think it is great someone is looking at the big picture. It's not about being shiny and new, it's about unification of the desktop, tablet, and mobile devices. Oh and don't forget, increased ease of management and deployment for us system admins. :-)