For more info, see: http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1334581167609&subtheme_id=1319359704521 Sub-theme 29: Unmasking Corruption: Critical Perspectives on Corruption and Anti-Corruption Convenors: Thomas Taro Lennerfors, Uppsala University, Sweden [log in to unmask] Eric Breit, Work Research Institute, Norway [log in to unmask] Alf Rehn, Åbo Akademi University, Finland [log in to unmask] Call for Papers The phenomenon of corruption is often described as a "cancer", "virus", or an "evil" that is haunting contemporary private and public organizations. Corruption, it is claimed, has to be combated using a ‘"wide range of strategies, networked in an integrated fashion over a long period of time" (Ajayi, 2005). Some call this a global war on corruption. Despite the massive impact that corrupt practices and the various measures taken to mitigate or eradicate it have on governments, organizations and their management, only scarce efforts have taken a critical, unmasking perspective on corruption and anti-corruption. Similarly, although scholars, documentarists, and essayists have sought to demonstrate and untangle the 'dark sides' of organizations and the seemingly omnipresent phenomena surrounding them (e.g., global warming) corruption is often taken for granted as a global "problem" and "threat". One may thus ask, is the evil of corruption (or the good of anti-corruption) beyond debate? Can't corruption be good (a question raised by Noonan, 2004)? Hence, the overarching aims of this sub-theme are embedded in the dual meaning of the title "unmasking corruption". First, to revisit and problematize the phenomenon of corruption and its impact on organizations and contemporary society. Second, to critically assess the "unmasking" business, that is, the industry and practices of contemporary anti-corruption. Exploring the potential of the Colloquium theme, we suggest that there are three crucial ways of unmasking corruption. One is by bridging continents. Ledeneva (1998, 2006), for example, discusses the necessity and importance of blat, or informal/illegal exchange, in the Soviet Union (the second, Other, world). Graham Hancock (1989) shows how (white) middlemen conspicuously live off the aid resources in third world countries, while distributing unnecessary resources to the locals – thereby problematizing the image of the Other as inherently corrupt. While cross-national and indeed cross-civilizational culture differences are covered by bridging continents, the idea of bridging cultures is the inclusion of various marginal voices. Anti-corruption is often implemented from above, where the voices of those in lower tiers who must pay the bribes are often neglected. Moreover, accusations of corruption are often directed towards a particular Other, be it another professional group, another industry, a competing company, or indeed the private in the eyes of the public and vice versa. By bridging worldviews, we can unmask dominant anti-corruption measures, embedded in "economic" principal-agent understandings of corruption, which suggests governance, surveillance, enforcement, and reporting as key ingredients in the fight against corruption. We can construct new understandings of corruption with a base in sociology, history, anthropology, organization theory, philosophy, political science, psychoanalysis, or indeed resource dependence theory, natural sciences, and ecology. We invite papers addressing this "unmasking" of corruption or anti-corruption from different perspectives. We particularly invite papers that engage with one of the three types of bridging suggested above, but papers that go beyond that scope are certainly invited: Good forms of corruption and/or bad (evil?) forms of anti-corruption The "cultural argument" – Western vs. non-Western constructions of corruption Discourses of corruption and anti-corruption Corruption, anti-corruption and the world economic crisis Anti-corruption organizations and their practices Institutional and longitudinal analyses of anti-corruption Theorizing corruption Corruption scandals and their impact The continued lives of the corrupt: radical change or business as usual? Relationship between anti-corruption and CSR Gender perspectives on corruption and anti-corruption The brands and images of anti-corruption Participants of this sub-theme are encouraged to submit their papers to the special issue "Corruption, Anti-Corruption, Critique" of ephemera – theory & politics in organization (ephemeraweb.org), edited by members of the convening group. Short papers should focus on the main ideas of the later full paper, i.e. they should explain the purpose of the paper, theoretical background, the research gap that is addressed, the approach taken, the methods of analysis (in empirical papers), main findings, and contributions. In addition, it is useful to indicate clearly how the paper links with the sub-theme and the overall theme of the Colloquium, although not all papers need to focus on the overall theme. Creativity, innovativeness, theoretical grounding, and critical thinking are typical characteristics of EGOS papers. Your short paper should comprise 3,000 words (inc. references, all appendices and other material). Submission period for short papers for the 29th EGOS Colloquium 2013: Start: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 End: Monday, January 14, 2013 References Ajayi, R. (2005): The House of Reps Crusade Against Corruption: Can the War Against Corruption Succeed?Vanguard, Nigeria, 18 January 2005, http:// www.vanguardngr.com/articles/2002/politics/p1180 12005-2.html Hancock, G. (1989): Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business.New York: Atlantic Monthly Press. Ledeneva, A.V. (1998): Russia's Economy of favour: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ledeneva, A.V. (2006): How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Noonan, J.T. Jr. (2004): 'Struggling Against Corruption.' In: W.C. Heffernan & J. Kleinig (eds.): Private and Public Corruption. Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield, 227–238. Thomas Taro Lennerfors is Senior Lecturer at Uppsala University, Sweden, and Visiting Researcher at Meiji University, Japan. His work concerns ethics, corruption and sustainability. Apart from three monographs, and some book chapters, he has published for example in the 'Journal of Business Ethics', 'Business and Society', 'Scandinavian Journal of Management', and 'Culture and Organization'. Eric Breit is Senior Researcher at Work Research Institute, Norway, and Visiting Researcher at Lund University, Sweden. His research revolves around organizational corruption, publicly disgraced organizations, and organizational identity and image. He has published in outlets such as the 'Journal of Business Ethics' and 'Culture and Organization'. Alf Rehn is Chair of Management and Organization at Åbo Akademi University, Finland. His research has dealt with subjects as varied as creativity, haute cuisine, project management, popular culture, philosophy, boredom, innovation, and luxury, and has been published in both a series of books and a large number of articles. He has also edited a series of special issues, for journals such as 'Organization', 'Organization Studies', 'Scandinavian Journal of Management', 'Entrepreneurship & Regional Development' and 'Management & Organizational History'. He is a devoted fan of Ethel Merman and the divine Patsy Cline. See further www.alfrehn.com ____ AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business. For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp To post message: [log in to unmask] For assistance: [log in to unmask] AIB-L is a moderated list.