Print

Print


Brian you raised a great point.

There was an article on the November 2011 issue of "The Atlantic"
magazine named "Hacked" (pg 100) which describes the perils of housing
data on the cloud.  It's not all bad but there are serious issues of
responsibility, access and support <there isn't a Google phone number
that I know someone can call for support> that need to be well thought
out before making the leap.  It's good to note that there are about 1
million Google accounts that are hacked yearly.  Not necessarily
Google's fault but how do one recover from that if you happen to be one
of the "lucky" ones?

 

Until recently, there was no way to retrieve data that was deleted from
any Google Applications.   If that could change, then perhaps other
fears could be alleviated as well in due time after some headaches.  

 

At the end of the day, it's good to recognize that there are no free
lunches and that in a digital world "free" should not be measured in
dollars & sense alone.

 

Firm.

 

From: Hoort, Brian [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] University of Michigan is going Google

 

The point is that the contracts have that pesky "Google may change the
terms of this agreement at any time" clause which makes any discussion
of their policies or procedures moot.  They can do whatever they want at
any time.  The contract means nothing so long as that clause stands.

 

Best,

 

Brian Hoort     |     517-355-3776

ANR Technology Services, MSU

 

From: Rytlewski, Jamie [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:02 AM
To: Hoort, Brian; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [MSUNAG] University of Michigan is going Google

 

Brian,

 

Your example is incorrect. We use Google Apps for their groups and since
other schools have "Gone Google", we've had a few issues with
conflicting accounts and other things. We opened up a ticket with Google
for the problems and they said they had no control over the other
school's accounts and could not make changes. 

 

This was the response:

 

"Unfortunately I cannot proceed to touch any domain if is not the admin
itself to tell me explicitly to do it. I hope you can understand this
policy as this is for protecting our customers, I guess you would not be
comfortable if someone open a case to us asking for deleting a user in
your domain."

 

Jamie

 

From: Hoort, Brian [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 9:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] University of Michigan is going Google

 

I was just at an ADUC meeting in which Tom Davis spoke on this very
issue a few days ago.  It was fascinating how strongly the non-IT staff
insisted that nothing be changed regarding MSU's email offerings.
"Absolutely no change" was the mandate.  I feel for ATS.  They've got
half the population demanding better services, and the other half
insisting on zero change.

 

The breadth of Google's offerings is very compelling, and growing all
the time.  MSU will not be able to keep pace with those offerings. Yet,
we have no control over the service. Google may change anything at any
time without consulting us.

 

Example:  A faculty's account password is compromised.  The account is
required for that faculty to access email, shared project documents, and
to attend meetings.  Spammers use the account to distribute thousands of
spam.  Google rightly disables the account.  What process does this
faculty have to recover the account?

 

As time goes on the chasm between service offerings will increase. I see
no solution at this point, but the pressure will continue to increase
with time.

 

Brian Hoort     |     517-355-3776

ANR Technology Services, MSU

 

From: l duynslager [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 9:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] University of Michigan is going Google

 

Putting everything in the cloud sounds great.   If you  think that all
expenses, responsibilities and risk are passed on to the provider.  

 

Some departments have grants from foundations, corporations,  federal
and state government to do critical security and defense related
research and contract work.

 

I don't think that all the risks and responsibilities to our customers
and stakeholders are transferred to the cloud provider and  MSU is still
liable in the case of an unauthorized disclosure of information.  

 

Unless those grantors will approve of storing of their sensitive data
with a cloud based provider beforehand.  

 

Makes you wonder how UM handled that?

 

Lee Duynslager

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: "Pilkenton, Alan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: "Pilkenton, Alan" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:03:33 +0000
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] University of Michigan is going Google

 

Yes it is true, the people in blue are going to be Googling.  The entire
U of M tech restructuring plan can be found here:
http://nextgen.umich.edu/projects/#umnet
<http://nextgen.umich.edu/projects/#umnet>  .  

Should we not be thinking along these lines as well?

 

Alan | Training Program Developer | ANR Technology Services |
517-355-3776

________________________________

From: Troy D Murray [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 5:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MSUNAG] University of Michigan is going Google

Looks like our "friends" down the road have decided to "Go Google".  I
have to admit that the idea of a unified messaging platform is appealing
rather then the three I use here now. 

 

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/go-blue-go-google.html


Troy Murray

Michigan State University

College of Medicine

B136D Life Science

E: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

P: 517-353-9576

F: 517-355-7254

RedHat 5 Certified Technician

RedHat 5 Certified Systems Administrator

HL7 V2.6/2.5 Certified Control Specialist