A quick Google brought up this option, which I don't know anything about, but free is always good ;)
 
http://www.cameyo.com/


 
 
-Steve Bogdanski
 
 
>>> On 7/14/2011 at  3:53 PM, Brian Hoort <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I was just reading
http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2011/06/windows-xp-apple-enterprise.p
hp and came across the quote (at bottom), "Forrester recommends that
companies use virtualization to run legacy applications such as Internet
Explorer 6 in isolated containers instead of clinging to outdated operating
systems that slow down the adoption of other technologies."

Virtualizing would certainly be one, extremely heavy-weight, solution to
this EBS/SAP problem. Then I'd have twice as many "machines" to patch and
maintain as before. Is there anything (free) out there that lets you
compartmentalize IE7 for example, without running an entire second operating
system instance?

Brian Hoort     |     517-355-3776
ANR Technology Services, MSU


-----Original Message-----
From: Vivek Joshi [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] EBS HR Module, SAP GUI and Adobe Acrobat

Makes sense, since the end-user environments are pretty locked down in most
businesses, makes it much easier to test and validate software. I had
someone tell me the other day that Toyota was still running win2k desktops.
At MSU we run the whole spectrum of OS and browser combinations.

-----Original Message-----
From: David McFarlane [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] EBS HR Module, SAP GUI and Adobe Acrobat

Well, I just had a phone call with someone in MSU Payroll, and that person
explained a few things that could make a difference in this discussion:

- SAP was designed for *businesses*, *not* universities.
- No one else makes a system designed for the practices at universities, so
SAP was actually the best of all the admitedly insufficienct alternatives at
the time.
- The old system not only had its own host of problems (perhaps not within
view of many of us, but real just the same), but support for it was ending.
So we really had no choice but to take up the best of what was offered and
then painfully adapt it to our peculiar needs.

No one else explained all this to me before (or they did, and I just wasn't
ready to hear it).  If this is all so, then I forthwith withdraw my ealier
"Here here!" to Rich's suggestion that some people involved in this deserve
to be relieved of duty, at least insofar as it might apply to anyone at MSU
-- chances are that everyone at MSU made the best decision and investment
under the circumstances.  Perhaps we are just stuck shoehorning a system
designed for businesses into serving our peculiar needs.

This might even somewhat soften my stance toward the shortcomings of SAP.
For all I know their system is well suited to the practices and loyalties of
their desired market, i.e., busineses, and if that is the case then who am I
to tell them they need to adapt their product to the vagaries of
universities?  It still seems to me that their business customers and every
one else would benefit by their dropping proprietary standards in favor of
common and ongoing standards, but what do I know?

-- dkm


At 7/7/2011 11:17 AM Thursday, David McFarlane wrote:
>Here here!
>
>-- dkm
>
>
>At 7/6/2011 02:34 PM Wednesday, Richard Wiggins wrote:
>>Official Web sites should adhere to Web standards.  Specifically, in
>>the year 2011, if a content provider claims that the content they
>>serve needs to adhere to a browser, such as IE8 instead of IE9, that
>>content provider is incompetent.  Their content needs to adhere to
>>HTML 5.  Any such content provider needs to be relieved of duty, and
>>their managers and administrators as well.
>>
>>/rich
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, STeve Andre'
>><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>The 4G requirement is just not correct for XP, since only 3G is usable
there.
>>
>>As for Acrobat, there might be some difference between 10.0, the
intermediate
>>version and 10.1.  A friend found an interesting rendering problem
>>that
was
>>resolved in the latest version which was in the first 10 version.
>>Maybe
this
>>is the problem?
>>
>>Has anyone used Foxit with  EBS?
>>
>>--STeve Andre'
>>
>>
>>On 07/06/11 10:36, Aldrich, Dak wrote:
>>Ok. Now this is getting frakking ridiculous.
>>
>>We had problems about 3 weeks ago and we called the EBS helpdesk.  We
>>called because it was taking 5 and 8 minutes to get any kind of
>>faculty appointment approved in the system.
>>
>>We were told that users HAD to have the LATEST version of Adobe...
>>Correct me if I'm wrong... ISN'T ACROBAT X THE LATEST VERSION?...  AND
>>they had to have 4 gigs of memory.  (Yes, that's exactly what I was
>>told.  And like a dip, I didn't get a name of the agent we spoke to.)
>>
>>So, what is it?  Is Acrobat X the problem?  Or is it not?  I really
>>wish we could get consistent answers between the web site, helpdesk,
>>and everyone else that's throwing answers around out there.
>>
>>My problem right now is that ALL users, except for one, are having the
>>same problem.  It's taking 5 to 8 minutes to process an approval for a
>>faculty appointment.  That means nothing to me, but the users that do
>>it here say that's unacceptable.  Only one machine is able to process
>>them in any acceptable amount of time.
>>
>>All machines have either XP Pro SP3 or Windows 7 SP1, IE 8, Acrobat
>>Reader X and SAP.  The only two differences between these machines are
>>the OS and that some have 2 gigs memory, others have 4 gigs.
>>Otherwise, they all have the same version of IE, SAP and Acrobat
Reader.
>>
>>Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>-dak
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kim Geiger [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:11 PM
>>To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] EBS HR Module, SAP GUI and Adobe Acrobat
>>
>>On 7/5/2011 at 4:02 PM, Lee
>>Duynslager<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>Hey has anybody else out there had problems with any of the PDF forms
>>Used with the SAP GUI in the HR module in EBS,  after the latest
>>updates to Windows?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>What did you do to resolve the problems?
>>
>>You know you can't have Acrobat X installed, right?
>>
>>--
>>Kim Geiger
>>Information Technologist
>>Broadcasting Services
>>Michigan State University
>><tel:517-432-3120%20x%20429>517-432-3120 x 429