 |
 |
Official Web sites should adhere to Web standards. Specifically, in the year 2011, if a content provider claims that the content they serve needs to adhere to a browser, such as IE8 instead of IE9, that content provider is incompetent. Their content needs to adhere to HTML 5. Any such content provider needs to be relieved of duty, and their managers and administrators as well. /rich On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > The 4G requirement is just not correct for XP, since only 3G is usable > there. > > As for Acrobat, there might be some difference between 10.0, the > intermediate > version and 10.1. A friend found an interesting rendering problem that was > resolved in the latest version which was in the first 10 version. Maybe > this > is the problem? > > Has anyone used Foxit with EBS? > > --STeve Andre' > > > On 07/06/11 10:36, Aldrich, Dak wrote: > >> Ok. Now this is getting frakking ridiculous. >> >> We had problems about 3 weeks ago and we called the EBS helpdesk. We >> called because it was taking 5 and 8 minutes to get any kind of faculty >> appointment approved in the system. >> >> We were told that users HAD to have the LATEST version of Adobe... >> Correct me if I'm wrong... ISN'T ACROBAT X THE LATEST VERSION?... AND they >> had to have 4 gigs of memory. (Yes, that's exactly what I was told. And >> like a dip, I didn't get a name of the agent we spoke to.) >> >> So, what is it? Is Acrobat X the problem? Or is it not? I really wish >> we could get consistent answers between the web site, helpdesk, and everyone >> else that's throwing answers around out there. >> >> My problem right now is that ALL users, except for one, are having the >> same problem. It's taking 5 to 8 minutes to process an approval for a >> faculty appointment. That means nothing to me, but the users that do it >> here say that's unacceptable. Only one machine is able to process them in >> any acceptable amount of time. >> >> All machines have either XP Pro SP3 or Windows 7 SP1, IE 8, Acrobat Reader >> X and SAP. The only two differences between these machines are the OS and >> that some have 2 gigs memory, others have 4 gigs. Otherwise, they all have >> the same version of IE, SAP and Acrobat Reader. >> >> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. >> >> -dak >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kim Geiger [mailto:[log in to unmask]] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:11 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] EBS HR Module, SAP GUI and Adobe Acrobat >> >> On 7/5/2011 at 4:02 PM, Lee Duynslager<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Hey has anybody else out there had problems with any of the PDF forms >>> Used with the SAP GUI in the HR module in EBS, after the latest >>> updates to Windows? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> What did you do to resolve the problems? >>> >> You know you can't have Acrobat X installed, right? >> >> -- >> Kim Geiger >> Information Technologist >> Broadcasting Services >> Michigan State University >> 517-432-3120 x 429 >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------- >> This message is only for the intended recipient(s). >> If you are not the named recipient you should not read, >> distribute or copy this email. Any views or opinions >> expressed in this email are those of the author and do >> not represent those of Michigan State University or the >> College of Music. Any information obtained from or >> contained in these emails is confidential. No >> information will be shared or given to any persons >> outside of the appropriate department(s). >> >