 |
 |
John, Ah, thanks for confirming that it is not just me :). And for the record, I received your reply to my initial post, but have not even received my own initial post yet. I find this behavior a bit disconcerting insofar as it can create the impression that clueless folks are replying to portions of a thread that others have already dealt with, as well as rather ruining the sequence and the sense of immediacy in the discussion. But as long as we all know about this and adjust our expectations accordingly then I will just accept it. -- dkm Fishbeck, John wrote: >Yeah, I've noticed this behavior as well. I've attributed it to sun >spots and gone blithely on my way... > >Regards, > >John Fishbeck >Physical Plant Computer Systems & Networking Group > > >-----Original Message----- >From: David McFarlane [mailto:[log in to unmask]] >Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:40 AM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: [MSUNAG] Delays in receiving MSUNAG e-mail? > >Does anyone else experience delays in getting e-mails through the >MSUNAG list? I have noticed this several times now, usually when I >submit a post to a thread, but now that I look into this I see that >it does not affect just my outgoing posts but also incoming posts from others. > >For instance, in today's thread "mail.msu.edu certificate", I >received Gary's opening post, then Jon Galbreath's initial reply, and >only later my own reply (which was sent before Jon's), as well as >Gary's reply to John Fishbeck's post. I have still not received John >Fishbeck's post, nor my own two later posts, although I can see them >at the MSUNAG Archives >(http://list.msu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind1009&L=MSUNAG&O=D&H=0&D=1&T=0 >), and I have received other messages to the thread that were sent >later. What gives? > >-- dkm