 |
 |
On Friday 20 August 2010 11:16:11 Leo Sell wrote: > We are investigating further. At this point I can advise you all that > there was no corruption of data during the migration and we are > reviewing the data sources. > > ATS will issue further explanatory information when it becomes available. Um, Leo, it isn't corruption so much as a mess-up. I saw entries in my accept list that I did not add. Others have seen things in their block list. At this point I think it is undeniable that something bad happened. Not horridly bad, but bad enough. ATS needs to make some kind of announcement now. It isn't like I've not done things like this, myself. I once switched several thousands of users to a new version of a shell, except my script got the logic wrong: users who wern't using that shell got the upgrade, and those that needed it, didn't get it.... (oops) --STeve Andre'