 |
 |
We use awstats for well over 100 sites. it's satisfactory. it does the robot separation stuff mentioned. it does by-country tracking/breakdowns as of a recent update. it's done all we've ever asked it to do in terms of gathering stats. we used analog for a while too, it was also satisfactory, we just had to choose one or the other for uniformity. the price for both is right, free, open-source. if you are really interested i could give you a link to an example stats page of ours to get a look at it's output, just msg. On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:09 -0400, Chris Wolf wrote: > We looked at these last year, trying to find a replacement for WebTrends > which we had been using for years, but which had grown too complicated and > too expensive. We chose SawMill http://www.sawmill.net/, primarily because > it was the only low-priced one that seemed serious about identifying visits > from spiders and eliminating them from the stats. Unfortunately, their Lite > version, which is free, probably won't meet most people's needs. We went > with a 5-profile license for SawMill Professional, which was $320 with the > educational discount. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Renee Starkey [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:37 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [MSUNAG] Apache log analyzer > > Hello > > Any one familiar with a good log analyzer for an apache web server? > > -- > Renee Starkey @-}-----}----- > Information Technologist I > 115 Old Horticulture > Language Learning Center, Michigan State University > Phone: 517-355-7587 > Fax: 517-432-5246