 |
 |
>>> On 7/13/2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Martinez <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Al, and everyone else, > > At the very moment you sent this to NAG another coworker called me up > reporting the same problem. It turns out that our virus scanner had a > definition added to it that was rejecting on the word/prefix/domain/etc. > 'com' - Needless to say I was enraged!! Someone already reported the > problem to the definition maintainer and I added the rule to the ignore > list. Another test shows that the messages are now going through that > were being rejected by that rule. Ouch. Just goes to show you should report problems to help.msu.edu - how could Brian fix a problem he didn't know about? Don't be like certain users we all know, who would rather sit and stew and blame you in bitter silence rather than report a problem and/or ask for help. -- Kim Geiger Information Technologist Broadcasting Services Michigan State University 517-432-3120 x 429