 |
 |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Brian Martinez<[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Al, and everyone else, > > At the very moment you sent this to NAG another coworker called me up > reporting the same problem. It turns out that our virus scanner had a > definition added to it that was rejecting on the word/prefix/domain/etc. > 'com' - Needless to say I was enraged!! Someone already reported the problem > to the definition maintainer and I added the rule to the ignore list. > Another test shows that the messages are now going through that were being > rejected by that rule. > > Messages that were rejected will need to be resent. You could monitor the virus-reject rate and send yourself annoying emails/pages when it gets too high; we recently did a similar thing at my current work because we had a similar problem (bad definition from vendor caused rate spike). > > Apologies, > ./brm > > > > Al Puzzuoli wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> Someone just attempted to reply to an email message I sent, and received >> the below error. Any idea what may have caused this? I suppose there could >> have been a virus involved; but I doubt it. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >