Your suggestion
seems to be completely workable.
Thanks Dave.
Firm.
From: Graff, Dave [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:58 PM
To: Charlot, Firmin
Subject: RE: Atomic Time Clock question
Is it absolutely essential that
these computers be on a physically separated network? It seems like you could
run these computers behind a firewall/NAT/proxy/whatever that only allows UDP
123 outbound and nothing inbound which would get the job done without that
added hardware costs of an atomic clock. So long as the management options are
only accessible from behind this border device, the security risk should be
effectively zero.
From: Charlot, Firmin
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:56 AM
Subject: Atomic Time Clock question
We have a few servers that we would like to keep off the
network <no physical path to the outside world) but would like to sync time
somehow. We are thinking about an Atomic Time Clock (getting its time
from radio signal) that’s equipped with an Ethernet port and an NTP
server.
Any comments, questions and suggestions are welcome.
Thanks.
Firmin
Charlot, ITIL, MCSE, A+, Information
Systems Manager
Michigan State University -
Student Services
Educational and Support Services 162 Student Services
Building East Lansing, MI 48824
[log in to unmask] (517)
432-7541
Submit technical requests at https://help.ess.msu.edu/