Print

Print


In Outlook, that is added when Person A has Send On Behalf of rights, vs Send As rights.  I would imagine Entourage would follow the same logic.  I find this blog post to be a good tutorial of what's happening there: http://www.shudnow.net/2007/08/12/send-on-behalf-and-send-as/

Also, when people are trying to send mail for another user (usually admin sending for director or something) I usually just default to Send As permission across the board to avoid the confusion.

Jon

Jon Galbreath
MCSE/Security+
Systems Administrator
International Studies and Programs
Ph: 517-884-2144
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Surato
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 4:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] mail.msu.edu spam headers

Leaving the Religious Debate alone.

For Entourage, if you mean that when person A sends on behalf of person B the message should read as from person B. I believe that Entourage does add "(Sent by Person A)" to the end of this. Outlook has a similar wording for this situation, but I do not remember it exactly.
--

+-------------------------------------------+
|            Michael Surato                 |
|      College of Arts and Letters          |
|      Michigan State University            |
|            320 Linton Hall                |
|        East Lansing, MI 48824             |
| Voice: (517) 353-0778 Fax: (517) 355-0159 |
+-------------------------------------------+

>>> On 1/12/2009 at 4:13 PM, "Aldrich, Dak" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> LOL  There's nothing religious about the truth.  LOL
>
> Also, does anyone have a lot of experience with Entourage?  I have one
> oddity with it.
>
> When we receive mail from THIS PERSON, sending on behalf of THAT PERSON, it
> shows as though it's from THAT PERSON (Sent by THIS PERSON).  Is that a
> setting i can change?  Or might that just be some "Microsoftism" that i just
> have to have my users live with and that will forever confuse them?  (No
> matter how many times i explain it to them, they just CAN'T figure out who
> it's really from.)
>
> -dak
>
> ********************
> * dak aldrich
> * network admin
> * college of music, msu
> * [log in to unmask]
> * 517.432.5045
> * comit.music.msu.edu
>
> ________________________________________
> From: MSU Network Administrators Group [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> David McFarlane [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 3:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] mail.msu.edu spam headers
>
> Jon Galbreath wrote:
>>I think the real solution here is just to dump Eudora in the can
>>where it belongs.
>
> Now now, let's not go trolling for a religious war :).
>
> -- dkm